Revisiting the Tony Batista Signing, 15 Years Later

[Nick Nelson]

On this date 15 years ago, one of the previous front office regime's more memorable offseason moves (for all the wrong reasons) took place.

 

Today, it's worth reflecting back on that ill-fated decision, as a measure of just how far we've come.On December 15th, 2005, the Minnesota Twins announced the signing of third baseman Tony Batista to a one year, $1.25 million contract.

 

The Twins, at this stage, were very much in World Series contention, despite having missed the playoffs for the first time in four years. Minnesota had an elite talent core, highlighted by Johan Santana, Joe Mauer, Justin Morneau, Torii Hunter, and a strong bullpen led by Joe Nathan.

 

They needed a few pieces to get them over the top. The Twins had a clear hole at the hot corner, having abandoned the "Michael Cuddyer, third baseman" experiment. The choice to fill it was Batista, a long-time big-leaguer who had spent the previous season playing in Japan.

 

At the time, I was a fledgling 20-year-old blogger, still in my first year of co-operating Nick & Nick’s Twins Blog. I recall being fairly ambivalent about the move, seeing it as a low-cost power infusion with glimmers of upside. But I’ll never forget the furious reaction of one Aaron Gleeman, whose blog I’d only recently begun to read with regularity.

 

In a piece titled “Tony F'ing Batista,” Gleeman eviscerated the move. “I have been critical of many Twins trades and signings in the past, but I can't possibly stress just how awful I think signing Batista is," he wrote. "I almost wish I had never disagreed with anything the franchise has ever done before, just so I could save up all of my disapproval for this singular decision."

 

As I’d later learn, he was absolutely right. All these years later, the Batista signing sticks in my memory for epitomizing so many frustrating traits and tendencies of the previous baseball ops department – traits that would endure and hamper the club’s efforts for another decade before a full overhaul in 2016.

 

The Batista signing represented three key downfalls of Terry Ryan and his disciples:

• Overvaluing traditional statistics. It’s a reflection of their dated evaluative methods, which quickly began to lag behind the times as an analytical revolution took hold of baseball. There was, quite literally, nothing very appealing about Batista other than his HR and RBI totals. He’d put up 32 homers and driven in 110 runs for Montreal two years earlier, but with a .272 on-base percentage, plainly bad defense, and a negative WAR. His performance in Japan the following year was much the same.

• Inability to assess and project performance from foreign pro leagues. There are many examples of former MLB players who spent a few years playing overseas and were revitalized; Eric Thames comes to mind, as does Miles Mikolas. If that’s what the Twins were hoping to achieve with Batista, they were woefully mistaken. His .263/.294/.463 slash line in one season with the Fukuoka Daiei Hawks, while uninspiring, proved to far exceed what he'd deliver the next year back in MLB. The Twins front office later flopped on high-profile international signings to fill immediate holes: Tsuyoshi Nishioka, and to a lesser extent, Byung-Ho Park.

• Unwillingness to decisively upgrade a championship-caliber roster. This was by far the most aggravating flaw, though not totally on the shoulders of the front office, since payroll limitations were more stark and suppressive in the Metrodome days. Still, the number of low-wattage veterans and creatively frugal pickups like Batista who were brought in to supplement a championship-caliber nucleus was infuriating – only more so in retrospect as we look back at the relentless playoff failures that defined that era of Twins baseball.

I bring all this up not to lament the past, but to appreciate the present. A completely retooled front office has returned the Twins to the top of the division, turning around a 103-loss team in just three years. Derek Falvey and Thad Levine have been able to accomplish this largely because they are the antithesis of TR's administration with respect to the three items above.

 

Overvaluing outdated performance metrics? Hardly. This operation is on the cutting edge analytically, which has fueled its immense success. Whereas the previous regime might've well kept around Eddie Rosario, cherishing his gaudy RBI totals and intangibles, it was never even a thought for the current front office.

 

There isn't a direct comparison to be made on the second point, as Falvey's front office has yet to make a significant acquisition from the Asian pro leagues. (The closest thing would be Wilin Rosario, who came back from Japan in 2019 and raked at Triple-A but didn't reach the majors.) But, if and when they do, I trust it'll be made on quality data and valid intel, rather than gut feelings and specious thinking. It's food for thought as KBO star Ha-seong Kim, a talented young shortstop who could potentially suit the Twins' needs quite nicely, is expected to be posted by the Kiwoom Heroes this winter.

 

As for Terry Ryan's penchant for nickel-and-diming his way through the ostensible construction of championship contenders? Here we find the sharpest contrast. And as mentioned earlier, it can't be entirely tied to the man in the GM's chair – things were very different back in 2005, when Carl Pohlad still ran the show and the Dome suffocated revenues.

 

To what extent these realities weighed against Ryan's instinctive frugality, I don't know. All I know is I'm so damn glad the script has flipped.

 

In signing Batista, Ryan spent $1.25 million to address a key need on a team that went on to win 96 games – in SPITE of Batista's brutal six weeks, which set up Nick Punto as a heroic figure by merely becoming an average replacement at third.

 

Take that number, multiply it by nearly 100, and you arrive at the amount committed to Josh Donaldson last winter. Not only was it the kind of emphatic, all-in investment that would've been unthinkable in the previous era, but it didn't even address a clear need. The Twins had a third baseman in Miguel Sano. They signed Donaldson to power up an already outstanding team and put it over the top.

 

We'll see what the current front office has in store this offseason, with the same opportunity still very much at hand and several needs to be addressed. I don't know what they'll do, but I am confident they won't sign the next Tony Batista.

 

If they do, I'll definitely be making a visit to Mr. Gleeman's feed at The Athletic.

 

MORE FROM TWINS DAILY

— Latest Twins coverage from our writers

— Recent Twins discussion in our forums

— Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email

 

Click here to view the article

[big dog]

Interesting question- who might be this year's Tony Batista? I don't mean who the Twins will sign, but what player out there might resemble Tony?

 

I'm not assigning this as homework to myself, but if a good candidate pops into my brain I will be sure to let people know. Because, you know, covid.

[Vanimal46]

On a positive note, if Batista wasn't so washed up in 2006, we never would have met Nick Punto! The 2005 off-season had some baffling moves. Batista is right up there, along with the rotting corpse of Rondell White. I can't believe he actually played in parts of 2 seasons for the Twins when they were contending for a WS title! 

I'll always have fond memories of imitating Tony Batista's batting stance playing backyard baseball in the neighborhood.

[Andrew Bryzgornia]

 

Interesting question- who might be this year's Tony Batista? I don't mean who the Twins will sign, but what player out there might resemble Tony?

 

I'm not assigning this as homework to myself, but if a good candidate pops into my brain I will be sure to let people know. Because, you know, covid.

 

Adam Duvall comes to mind off the top of my head. 

[Linus]

I don’t get the comparison. Completely apples to oranges in every way. How many teams were analytically driven 15 years ago? What were the payroll restrictions?

 

It was a bad signing but every FO whiffs sometimes including our current FO.

[gunnarthor]

It's 2020 and Nick is still complaining about Terry Ryan. Good lord, move on man. 

[Nick Nelson]

 

It's 2020 and Nick is still complaining about Terry Ryan. Good lord, move on man. 

I'm not complaining about Terry Ryan. I'm expressing appreciation for the new front office and the transformative change in ownership investment compared to 15 years ago. Thought that was pretty clear? 

[Nick Nelson]

 

I don’t get the comparison. Completely apples to oranges in every way. How many teams were analytically driven 15 years ago? What were the payroll restrictions?

It was a bad signing but every FO whiffs sometimes including our current FO.

There's a difference between being "analytically driven" & having "payroll restrictions" and signing Tony Batista for $1 million to fill a critical need on a WS contender. The Twins were at the extreme ends of both sides during that era, now they've moved to the opposite end of the spectrum. Which to me is worthy of reflecting on during a slow offseason. I guess not to everyone! 

[Dodecahedron]

 

more so in retrospect as we look back at the relentless playoff failures that defined that era of Twins baseball.

 

We are still in the era of playoff failures.

 

I agree that it is difficult to imagine this front office signing someone like Batista or sticking with players like Brendan Harris or even Nick Punto for as many years as the last group stuck with them. Instead, we are debating whether getting rid of someone like Rosario is a good idea. This is a completely different league of thought.

 

As for being analytically-driven, even the traditional stats were not big on those guys in the Ryan era. Ryan was believing his own press -- that he could grab an old, past-his-prime player, turn him back into a swan, and save cash along the way. This worked often enough in the 00s, no doubt because there was a good core in place and the front office was just working the margins. When he took over the team a second time, this approach was embarrassing.

[theBOMisthebomb]

On a positive note, if Batista wasn't so washed up in 2006, we never would have met Nick Punto! The 2005 off-season had some baffling moves. Batista is right up there, along with the rotting corpse of Rondell White. I can't believe he actually played in parts of 2 seasons for the Twins when they were contending for a WS title! 

I'll always have fond memories of imitating Tony Batista's batting stance playing backyard baseball in the neighborhood.

Yes, the Rondell White era still infuriates me to this day.

[tony&rodney]

When Eloise died Carl lost all interest in the Twins. There are issues and complexities to front office dynamics that we cannot imagine or fathom. Often it is small nuances that affect the funding and decisions made in wake of said moods which direct the GM's player acquisitions. The comparisons between Ryan and Falvine don't work. A criticism or boost for either is best made within each era and related to the directives of the man who holds the wallet.

Batista was terrible, really bad. I think he was gone after around 50 games and then someone gave him another shot a year later. Tired Tony was hardly the worst player in Twins history though and we didn't suffer with him the entire year .

[old nurse]

There wasn’t much in the garbage heap that year for 3B. Be happy that he did not spend more. Beltre was about it. Carl wasn’t likely to approve that contract. The context of analytics is pretty moot with that group. Bautista at least had a decent recent ceiling. Wes Helms had his best season ever. I don’t think he would have been on anyone’s radar. I doubt many have heard of him. (Levi, are you still alive to tell me you heard of him?)

[mnfireman]

Imagine if you will, a season so turned that Nick Punto may be the teams MVP despite being 10% below league average AND his teammate won the league MVP....

[frightwig]

The Batista mistake was compounded by the Twins' commitment to Juan Castro--and Gardy's decision to send Jason Bartlett back to AAA because he lacked leadership and a "fire in the belly."

 

The current front office still makes its share of low-cost, marginal moves, often in hopes that the player will bounce back from a down season or injury--and I'd say that picking up Jonathan Schoop wasn't all that different than Batista, apart from Schoop being younger. But there doesn't seem to be many complete head-scratchers lately, and I think it's been awhile since the club really jerked around a youngster because the field manager wanted to assert his authority. 

 

When it's all done, the splashy Donaldson signing may turn out to be one of their bigger mistakes.