Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Blake Parker DFA'd


Vanimal46

Recommended Posts

Parker is in a tricky spot. He is ~13 days short of 5 years service time, the threshold at which he can refuse an assignment but still collect his salary (basically forcing the team to release or trade him if they want him off the roster).

He has over 3 years service time, though, as well as been outrighted before in his career, so he can still refuse an assignment, but in doing so, he would forfeit what remains on his 2019 contract.

 

https://www.thecubreporter.com/book/export/html/3530

Which was probably extremely well known by Falvine and probably explains the timing of his DFA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Community Moderator

In a late July where every contender is looking for pen help, not one single team thought Blake Parker was worth $600k.

 

This is a guy who the Twins sent out with an 8th inning lead the night before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

 

It would appear that Thorpe and Stashak have progressed this year to the point that they are better than Parker. I guess that it is a bad thing that players develop to be better than the lower priced free agent.

Stashak has given up too many hits, he has been able to limit the damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Which was probably extremely well known by Falvine and probably explains the timing of his DFA.

Yup. And also with the structure of Parker's contract, with a lower base plus incentives for appearances. (Although if they had doubts about Parker finishing the season way back then, they probably could/should have aimed higher last offseason too.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

According to the PPress, Parker elected free agency.

 

Good luck to Blake, I hope he catches on somewhere else. And I hope the Twins get to play that team a couple of times before the season is over. #Bombas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yup. And also with the structure of Parker's contract, with a lower base plus incentives for appearances. (Although if they had doubts about Parker finishing the season way back then, they probably could/should have aimed higher last offseason too.)

Ottovino, Britton, Holland and Romo are about the only free agent pitchers that have performed better.. It was not a good year for free agent relievers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Ottovino, Britton, Holland and Romo are about the only free agent pitchers that have performed better.. It was not a good year for free agent relievers

 

Yeah too bad. I was all gung-ho about free agent relievers last year, I'm quite confident there are multiple posts somewhere around here were I proclaimed there were close to two dozen of them I'd love to get my hands on, and those four weren't anywhere near my favorites. Oops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I have no idea why a bad team didn't sign him and try to recover his SP value. What do Balt, Mia, Det, KC, et. al. have to lose?

 

In theory they have enough prospects/projects starting right now. KC for example is just running a steady diet of the same young 5 guys out there. They want to get those guys work, rather than bring in Mejia and see if he can fix his stuff. Better the devil you know.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah too bad. I was all gung-ho about free agent relievers last year, I'm quite confident there are multiple posts somewhere around here were I proclaimed there were close to two dozen of them I'd love to get my hands on, and those four weren't anywhere near my favorites. Oops.

 

I'll admit it. I was banging the drum for David Robertson. He of the 6.2 innings and 5.40 ERA and the 3/$35MM Robertsons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Community Moderator

 

Responsible for his salary, plus now he is in the minors and off their 40-man roster.

The news says he signed a Major League deal, no?

 

They did potentially save a few bucks though on salary. Probably paying pro-rated MLB minimum, instead of what was left on Parker's $1.8M?? deal.

 

Parker and/or agent must have had an idea he'd be signed, else I can't imagine he would have refused the Rochester assignment, forfeiting the remainder of his salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The news says he signed a Major League deal, no?

 

They did potentially save a few bucks though on salary. Probably paying pro-rated MLB minimum, instead of what was left on Parker's $1.8M?? deal.

My bad. I misread it as a minor league contract. Parker will be in the Phillies bullpen shortly. I wonder if Phils fans will be excited for this move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why didn't Phillies claim Parker off waiver earlier?

Salary. Claiming him would have not only cost $600k base salary for the rest of the season, but also up to $1.4 mil in incentives (roster bonuses). Plus in ~13 more days, he would have gained the right to refuse an outright assignment but still collect his full salary.

 

As it is, Philly can now just pay him league minimum, ~$200k or so for the rest of the season, with no incentives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...