Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: Week in Review: Breaking Even


Recommended Posts

Community Moderator

 

Well, I hear you. But saying a pitcher only has two pitches is kind of like telling someone what their ceiling is. Don't most pitchers throw a change up, slider, curve and fastball, to varying degrees of success?  Don't most pitchers have a fastball, curve and change coming out of high school? 

Aren't the slider and cutter just a slight variation off the 2 seam fastball? A little more torque and different release. 

 

Maybe the reason he relies on his best pitches is because he often comes into a game in a high leverage situation. No room for error. Stretch him out as a starter and he will have more opportunity to throw waste pitches and face batters with bases empty.

 

It is just an idea. 

You're aware, aren't you, that Rogers spent the majority of his minor league career as a (fairly nondescript) starter? And was moved intentionally to a relief role?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

56 wins, 33 losses going into the All Star break. Who predicted that? Not me, that's for sure. We had all become so accustomed to a losing team that even when we saw this stacked lineup in April, we assumed that all kinds of things would go wrong:

 

Schoop would not hit, play mediocre 2B.

Pineda would be terrible, probably blow out his elbow again.

Gonzo would look mediocre, nowhere near as good as Escobar.

Cruz would be a total has-been, spend most of his time on the IL.

Adrianza would field okay, but not hit his weight.

Buxton would struggle, stub a toe, miss half the season, then whiff at every outside curve.

Castro would struggle with the repaired knee, miss half the season on the IL, not hit a lick.

Garver would let every other pitch get by him, but hit pretty good.

Polanco would regress.

Sano would arrive in training camp 60 pounds overweight, then get hurt (almost true).

Cron would be a flash in the pan and an average first baseman.

Willians Astudillo would look like us, and play like us. Chubby people can't play...right??

Kepler would whiff and whiff, and look at best average in RF.

Rosario would be the only star, a single s'more on a dumpster fire.

Berrios would look average.

Gibson would pitch a couple good games, then implode.

Jake Cave would wind up playing CF most of the year, look pleasantly average.

Odorizzi would have another mediocre year. ERA about 4.5

Luis Arraez? Yeah, right. And I will stumble over a ten-pound emerald.

Martin Perez? Soft-tossing lefty with nothing special except control issues.

Devin Smeltzer? Never heard of him. Another slow-tossing lefty? Mercy!

Ryan Harper? Boom, boom, boom to his feeble curves and sub-90 heat. That was my prediction.

Tyler Duffey would get DFA'd. Head case with no effective pitches.

Blake Parker? More tics than Nathan, half the talent. Walk walk, boom boom boom.

Trevor May would have more walks and home runs than strike outs.

Magill and Morin? Did the FO give up on the season before the season? People said that.

Not sure I should mention Mejia, who has lived up to all our pessimism so far.

Taylor Rogers looked good last year, thus he would look bad this year.

Zach Littell would never make it, can't throw over 90.

Hildenberger would be the only reliable arm in the pen, but it wouldn't matter.
Kohl Stewart would look like a complete flop.

Lewis Thorpe would throw hard, but look like a nervous rookie.

Baldelli would be a nice guy tending a daycare full of spoiled and angry children.

 

Instead, we were slapped in the face with the wet mop of success, knocked off our feet, landing on the throne of first place in the American League. Somebody shoved a crown on our heads, and we were like, "Wait, what??" 

 

This is not to say the Twins have not suffered any problems this season. However, at some point, nearly every man on that list has played like an All Star. To the core of my being, shocked I was. Talked like Yoda I did. 

 

Now, as together we stand at the grim precipice of success, looking out over the terrifying prospect of a winning season, we must gather all our pessimism and hurl negation upon this vile aberration! No way, bruh! This ain't happenin'! We're the Minnesota Twinkies, man! We gotta real pretty ballpark, but that's where I draw the line! I like the Philly cheese steak, and the Goose Island is great, but I will not stand here and suffer through the false hope of a good looking baseball team!

 

Who's with me? We're all moving to Detroit, to cheer for Gardy and the Tigers! Yaaaaaaaa....

TL:DR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You're aware, aren't you, that Rogers spent the majority of his minor league career as a (fairly nondescript) starter? And was moved intentionally to a relief role?

Sure. And I don't think that you can really say that he hasn't learned anything since then. He is a much better pitcher now than he was then. A lot of that is confidence and command.

 

Almost every MLB pitcher started as a starter. Every major leaguer was the stud pitcher of his high school or college team. Starter #1.  But the transition between starter and reliever is more fluid than people realize.  Santana started in the BP. So did Frankie.  Dennie Eckersly started off as a starter. He was a pretty good starter. But he was a great reliever. We don't see transitions from BP to starter as much. It is outside the box thinking. 

 

Rogers' best weapon is his ability to hit spots and use pin point control (which means that he can hit the mitt most of the time). That translates well into a starter role. The question is, will it hold up the third time through the order?

 

I got to thinking about this when I considered the relative cost of adding a SP versus a couple BP arms.  You can get two solid BP arms for less than what you pay for a stud starter. So if you can get a guy already on the team and under contract to be a starter, why not try it? Spend the money for two better BP arms. 

 

I think Rogers has shown that he can dominate batters. But the FO has to compare whether he is more useful pitching 3 times a week for one or two innings versus every 5 days for 6 innings. 

Edited by Kelly Vance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reports of the demise of the Cleveland Indians were premature. They have the exact same record at the break that they had last year...when they went on to win 91 games.  But IMO, the relevant target still should not be Cleveland...the Twins are still in a position to be able to win the division by going something like 38-35 in the second half. The target/objective should be being relevant in a post-season series against the likes of NYY, Astros, a hot Red Sox club, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure. And I don't think that you can really say that he hasn't learned anything since then. He is a much better pitcher now than he was then. A lot of that is confidence and command.

 

Almost every MLB pitcher started as a starter. Every major leaguer was the stud pitcher of his high school or college team. Starter #1. But the transition between starter and reliever is more fluid than people realize. Santana started in the BP. So did Frankie. Dennie Eckersly started off as a starter. He was a pretty good starter. But he was a great reliever. We don't see transitions from BP to starter as much. It is outside the box thinking.

 

Rogers' best weapon is his ability to hit spots and use pin point control (which means that he can hit the mitt most of the time). That translates well into a starter role. The question is, will it hold up the third time through the order?

 

I got to thinking about this when I considered the relative cost of adding a SP versus a couple BP arms. You can get two solid BP arms for less than what you pay for a stud starter. So if you can get a guy already on the team and under contract to be a starter, why not try it? Spend the money for two better BP arms.

 

I think Rogers has shown that he can dominate batters. But the FO has to compare whether he is more useful pitching 3 times a week for one or two innings versus every 5 days for 6 innings.

I think one can positively say that since reaching the majors he hasn’t developed a third pitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You are right, of course. Local brews shall take precedence. Notice that the Big Boys are trying to imitate the look of local brews. They fooled me, the blighters!

Goose Island started life as an independent brewery but was bought out a few years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...