Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: What Version of Madison Bumgarner Would the Twins Be Getting?


Recommended Posts

Twins Daily Contributor

Over the weekend, reports surfaced about the Twins and Giants discussing a potential deal for Madison Bumgarner. The 29-year old pitcher is set to hit free agency this off-season and the Giants are most likely going to try and get something back for their former World Series star. Most of Twins Territory hasn’t seen a lot from Bumgarner in recent years and they may only remember him for his herculean effort in the 2014 Postseason.

 

What version of Bumgarner would the Twins be getting?Vintage Bumgarner

From 2011 through 2016, Bumgarner was one of the best pitchers in baseball and he was a workhorse for the Giants on the way to multiple World Series titles. He was a four-time All-Star and a two-time Silver Slugger along with winning the NLCS MVP and the World Series MVP. He finished in the top-10 in the Cy Young voting for four straight seasons and two of those seasons saw him in the top-5.

 

Statistically speaking, he averaged over 210 innings per season with a 3.00 ERA and a 1.08 WHIP. He averaged 9.1 K/9 and 2.1 BB/9 along with a 121 ERA+ and a 3.07 FIP. According to FanGraphs, he had the ninth highest WAR total among pitchers placing him just behind Chris Sale, Cole Hamels and Zack Greinke. Baseball Reference ranked him in the top-10 among pitcher WAR in 2015 and 2016.

 

He was on top of the baseball world, but he’s hasn’t looked like the same pitcher in recent years.

 

Recent Bumgarner

Since 2016, Bumgarner missed time due to injury and he certainly hasn’t been the workhorse he was in the first half of the decade. After averaging over 200 innings per season for six straight years, he has been limited to under 130 innings in 2017 and 2018. Last season, he suffered a broken hand after being hit by a line drive. Back in 2017, he missed time with a Grade 2 sprain of the AC join in his throwing shoulder and bruised ribs. He had a dirt bike accident that year that were the root of his problems.

 

This season, his ERA is almost 80 points higher than his career mark, but his 1.17 WHIP and his 8.7 K/9 are right in line with his career totals. Batters are barreling up the ball against him at an all-time high. He is allowing a 9.4 Barrel % (6.3 % MLB Average) and an 89.7 Exit Velocity (87.4 MLB Average). His fastball velocity is in the 11th percentile but his fastball spin ranks in the 85th percentile. Also, his curve spin is in the 71st percentile.

 

Is Bumgarner an Upgrade?

Jose Berrios is coming off his best start of the season and Jake Odorizzi is near the top of the league in ERA. At this point, these two players would be locks for Minnesota’s post-season rotation. Kyle Gibson would be the third pitcher at this point, and he has put up similar numbers to Bumgarner so far this year. They are within 17 points of each other in ERA, FIP, and ERA+. Gibson is striking out more batters and walking fewer batters per nine innings than Bumgarner.

 

Michael Pineda has been a little bit of a roller coaster ride but his fastball is playing better since he came back from the disabled list. While Pineda has been performing better, Martin Perez has struggled in recent starts. Perez looked like a Cy Young candidate in his first eight starts with a 2.17 ERA and he held opponents to a .644 OPS. Over his last four starts, he has allowed 16 earned runs in 19 innings (7.58 ERA) and batters are getting on base 36% of the time against him.

 

Looking at the Twins current roster, Bumgarner might be the fourth best pitcher in the Twins rotation. His playoff experience could certainly help, but what version of Bumgarner would the Twins be getting in a trade? Will they get vintage Bumgarner or some version of the player from the last three seasons?

 

Click here to view the article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only are his numbers down but he's just a rental. I hope they don't trade for him unless:

 

The Twins only give up a lottery ticket minor leaguer.

 

OR

 

Wes Johnson sees something fixable in MadBaum, and MadBaum agrees to negotiate a two year contract extension.

 

Otherwise I pass.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On paper he may not seem like an upgrade over Gibson and Pineda, but the games aren't played on paper. He has the post-season experience and obviously still the drive and fire; however, playing on a mediocre team has hurt his value. Getting a pitcher of his stature would enable Perez to give us another lefty in the bullpen. I wouldn't overspend on him and would like an extension of a couple years, but he would be a good start (good RPs would be an even better start) to improve our pitching. We have the prospects. Don't panic and make bad trades, but we do have to improve our pen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like he's been turning it around over his last 5 starts...

 

6 IP average - 3.19 ERA - 7.5 K/9 - 9 BB in 31 innings.

 

If you believe the Twins are ahead of San Francisco in the analytics department (I do) you should feel confident the Twins will find ways to optimize him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd absolutely take him for depth, but I wouldn't be counting on him slotting anywhere higher than 4th in the rotation. I'm not a fan of guys coming over from the NL and I'm not a fan of guys with that much mileage on their arms. 

 

But, a deal for such a big name, even if he's past his prime, would surely give the clubhouse a booster shot of morale. They may not need one, but extra morale isn't on the banned substance list last I checked so it wouldn't hurt.

 

Also, it would make vanimal extra happy if anyone feels like throwing him a bone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Maybe the Twins need a guy like Bumgarner but I’m so fixated on the bullpen that I don’t really care about anything else.

Bumgarner as a starter could free up Perez for the BP.  The question is of course would Perez be an improvement to the BP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I'm out on MadBum as a top option.  I saw one report that the Giants asking price would be pretty high.  If that's the case I would rather see the Twins go after a starter with team control next year to have one more rotation piece locked up.  If they add another starter I could see using Pineda and Perez in a piggy back role again.  Still need another bullpen arm or two after that also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the start of 2017, Bumgarner has basically been a 3rd or 4th starter who has missed a number of games due to injuries. Factor in he's a rental and there is no way I'd pay a significant price to acquire him. If the Twins can get him with a package of mid range prospects they should go for it. If it costs a top prospect they should pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he would cost extra because he's such a fan favorite, and a link to their WS wins. They're not going to be valuing him based on future production. It would be like trading Joe Mauer. It might happen as a favor, if he wanted to go to a playoff team.

 

And I agree with the point above that he might not be a huge upgrade over Gibson. I think Gibson's stuff could play well in the playoffs. Odorizzi makes me nervous though. All those strikeouts on high fastballs could become dingers against the Yankees.

 

I am just not convinced Odo, Perez or Pineda could subdue a top team. So I'd be fine with MadBum, if the cost was based on his projected future production. But they'd probably do better to find someone on the way up than the way down, like a Ryan Pressly, not a "proven closer" or former star with "playoff experience."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people need to look beyond his regular season numbers for a second and realize that Bumgarner would provide something very important for this team: successful playoff experience. Berrios and Perez are the only ones in the rotation with past playoff experience.

 

Berrios in playoff games? 3 IP with 3 ER.

 

Perez in playoff games? 5 IP with 4 ER.

 

Bumgarner in playoff games? 102.1 IP with 24 ER. A 2.11 ERA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think people need to look beyond his regular season numbers for a second and realize that Bumgarner would provide something very important for this team: successful playoff experience. Berrios and Perez are the only ones in the rotation with past playoff experience.

 

Berrios in playoff games? 3 IP with 3 ER.

 

Perez in playoff games? 5 IP with 4 ER.

 

Bumgarner in playoff games? 102.1 IP with 24 ER. A 2.11 ERA.

 

From my perspective experience just translates to getting old. It doesn't carry a ton of weight with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the headline read "Are," not "Would Be" getting.

 

Perez in the bullpen at the start of the year was none too inspiring, and probably not what he signed up for, not that it should matter. 

 

For the right price, say Nick Gordon straight up, I'd do it.  Mix Smith in, and now you've really got me intrigued.

 

This just feels an awful lot like the Verlander deal for Houston, even if the numbers don't hold up under scrutiny.  All things being as they are right now, out of the pitchers the Twins have right now, plus MadBum, I'd pick him to start Game 3 in Yankee Stadium.  And Game 7 at home.

 

Kind of a pickle--I'm not quite ready to displace any of the starters right now, but what are the odds that one of them doesn't turn into a pumpkin between now and October?  The depth we have right now is Smeltzer and Stewart and Thorpe, right?  

 

Do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully, no version.

 

I for one am happy to go to war in the postseason with the army that gets us there.  With Pineda getting better almost every start, we will have 5 good starters from which to choose 4.  

 

Now do we need to add an arm or two to the bullpen, yes.  I hope that is where the FO focuses their attention and uses their ammunition to strengthen the pen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Almost certainly but not the kind of guaranteed upgrade I want to see in the bullpen.

 

I'll never see anyone as a guaranteed upgrade, which is probably why I don't view current or past counting stats as a great indicator of continued success for a pitcher moving teams and why I'd prefer to use some of the peripheral and anecdotal evidence to figure out if the guy will be good upon a move here.

 

These guys are uprooting themselves and perhaps their family, going to a new city, a new stadium, a new climate with new teammates and new coaches, sometimes against their will unbeknownst to the fans, sometimes to their excitement but almost always burdened with high expectations.

 

I'm wholly in favor of multiple trades for the pen, but big names aren't going to give me a ton more confidence than under-the-radar names simply because how many psychological human factors are at play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Debuted at 19 though. Compare with Barry Zito.

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/z/zitoba01.shtml

Why are they comparable? They're both left handed? Here's a comparison with Justin Verlander, who also was a work horse with tons of mileage on his arm.

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/v/verlaju01.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a way, I'd rather have him as a free agent in the off-season than pay much for him as a rental. I think he's got years left as a 3-4 guy (maybe more?). The games he's missed in recent years were not due to arm issues. But I don't think he's much of an upgrade vs a strong Gibson as of this moment. Then again, he'd be great insurance headed into the post season in the event that Odo/Gibson especially turn into pumpkins (as Han mentions above) between now and then. Not easy call. SF will lose leverage as the deadline approaches...there will be pressure for them to get something for him. It will be a game of chicken among the contenders as that date approaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Maybe the Twins need a guy like Bumgarner but I’m so fixated on the bullpen that I don’t really care about anything else.

 

It is certainly understandable to fixate on the bullpen but you are going to fixate on it even more if one of our starters goes down... or two starters go down and this sort of thing happens all the time. We've been extremely lucky so far. 

 

I'm also fixating on that bullpen... fixating both directly and indirectly. Indirectly, I believe finding a starter is priority one and perhaps the biggest thing we can do to help the bullpen going forward. 

 

I believe we need a starter and bullpen and that may be the order. 

 

I'm reasonably certain the front office sees this and reasonably certain they will do something. I can't wait to see what they do. 

 

Fun times!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...