Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Is Castro odd man out?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

 

Don't forget ... there are a couple of relievers on the DL/IL who will be back soon.

True.

 

Magill is apparently going to AAA for a rehab assignment right now, and is out of options. I guess we could swap him for Harper or Vasquez at the bottom of the pen, but I can't imagine making a major roster move to fit him in. I could see Magill DFA'd instead, if there's no one we want to remove.

 

Moya will start his rehab this week, but he also has options remaining.

 

Reed still seems a bit further off:

https://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/baseball/news/twins-gabriel-moya-rehab-assignment-begins-next-week/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

I think that we will see a series of phantom injuries to allow Sano playing time for a number of reasons.  First, no guarantee that he stays healthy.  Second, no guarantee that he doesn't go into a funk.  Third, we really can't afford to lose any of the guys mentioned above.  Fourth, having 3 catchers is a great luxury for any manager to have when they can hit.  Without the 3rd catcher, you have one fewer pinch hitters available (actually 2, but you know what I mean).  Also, there may be some actual injuries by then as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it great to be talking about the Twins having a difficult decision of what move to make when a starter comes back from the IL?

 

Considering that Cave hasn't played hardly at all, I see him optioned to Rochester.  That means no one will be lost to the organization (Adrianza would be claimed).  The Twins have several players who can play the outfield in an emergency or even for a few games (Astudillo, Gonzalez and Adrianza) until Cave is brought back if one of the three starters is injured.  Considering that the outfield is set for almost all games, it seems to be the best choice to me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Or we can stay 3 deep there and not worry about it and simply option Astrudillo or cut Adrianza... I don't think Castro goes except via trade deadline once the season is much closer to ending and our playoff picture in consideration.. certainly not now. 

 

He's not going to get DFAd as he's got value to other teams, and there's no reason to move him at this point until the deadline gets a lot closer. That's probably the soonest.

 

I get your point about Rochester catchers, but the bottom line is that I doubt the front office wants them in consideration for any time as long as this team is in the playoff picture. If we're in the hunt come trade deadline, he might get moved for an RP or prospects if Garver/Astrudillo are healthy and producing, and he won't be moved at all if one is injured/ineffective. 

If I was GM, I might make Garver the starter and Castro the back up before I would trade Castro and risk needing the AAA guys at some point. This would leave me trying to decide who to send down or cut. I just wanted to point out there is that possibility that could increase as the year wears on if the other two keep producing and Castro's bat remains dead.

 

At this point, I see Adrianza as the most expendable. If Polanco goes down, Marwin can fill in for a brief amount of time, a longer amount of time might mean bringing up someone. 

 

Castro's and Adrianza's bats are not reasons to hold other players back or have them sent down. The big question then is whether or not their defensive sides can be replaced. I lean towards yes.

 

Again, In Rochester you have Gordon who is a prospect (admittedly not ready) and a couple guys with many years up and down that provide flexible insurance at multiple positions plus a couple more that have shown lots of flexibility in their defensive positions. (Rosales, Torreyes, Valdespin, and Maggi). Again, I don't see these as guys to rely on but I don't see Adrianza's bat as something I want to rely on either.

 

If Adrianza truly has value, maybe he gets traded. I don't think he is that important to the team though. Frankly, in my opinion, he is replaceable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Tough call. I like Astudiilo but he didn't really hit so well when he started to get regular playing time.

 

Astudillo's 'bad game' sample size is two.

 

Keep this stuff coming though, he thrives off people doubting him. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No need. They can either start using the relief arms they have (Harper and Mejia) or they can start swapping fresh pitchers through those spots as needed (Harper's spot, I guess, since he has options).

I'd be shocked (pleasantly) if they didn't move to 13 pitchers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team is already backing off the idea of Sano returning May 1st. It sounds like he has gotten out of shape again while injured. Baldelli is quoted as wanting to make sure Sano gats back in playing shape before he faces any live action and is now targeting the 1st of May as when he will start playing in the Fort. A lot of other things can happen before that takes place in roster considerations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Twins have the best WAR in the AL at the catcher position with 0.4.

 

If Castro were not on the team, it would be 0.6. The closest team is at 0.3.

 

Of the three, Garver has been the best defender.

Looks like he has the poorest defensive numbers of the three on fangraphs but I don’t see how it is meaningful.

 

There is no way that I would release Castro. Neither Garver or Astudillo have shown themselves to be adequate catchers over any significant length of time.

 

I also would be concerned about Garver’s concussion history. Releasing Castro and a Garver injury would leave them too thin.

 

Garver should be the one that gets 4 starts a week unless and until he shows the same defensive shortcomings as last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stated before the season began I found the various proposed lineups offered interesting as they pretty much all listed Castro as the starter. I asked why? I've felt for some time now Garver was a legitimate challenger for the starting spot.

 

I have also stated I think the team missed Castro a lot more season that many realize or want to admit. His experience means something.

 

Recently, I also stated I had a lot of respect for Castro, and that I feel he's a better player, with more value, than he or his OPS indicate. But I also felt he was the odd man out.

 

How can all of these things be true? Am I talking out of both sides of my mouth? Not at all. All of these ARE true. But Garver has continued to improve both defensively and offensively. Astudillo is starting to prove to everyone he is legitimate. But having veteran insurance and experience with a pair of young backstops is a great luxury. One it would be nice to hold on to for as long as possible. Thankfully, no decision has to be made today. IF the decision comes down to the catcher spot, then Castro...unsigned after 2019, weakest bat...is the obvious choice.

 

Again, the decision doesnt have to be made now. Cave has options, being sent down wouldn't be forever, and there are guys to cover his role at least temporarily. Adrianza is gone for good if he's the choice. I think it's real easy to dismiss him. Good to excellent defense. An above. 250 BA with some pop. A lot of teams would like to have that. Again, easy to dismiss him. Do the Twins feel he's that easy to dismiss?

 

Let's hope, when the time comes, the moves seems obvious, or can be assisted by a minor IL stint or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember about 5 years ago there was a player with a great story and a fan favorite in many of the same ways as Astudillo. He was in his late 20's. Even had pet nicknames. Almost single-handedly carried a hopeful Twins team through April. An amazing month by all MLB standards. Nobody knew a future PED suspension was in his future. There were a lot of reasons he didn't make it, and the many fans went nuts. They loved to root for him, and were disappointed and angry at the opportunites that they thought were unjustly taken away or not supplied. Chris Colabello had a pretty good darn good 333 AB season with Toronto in 2015, too. But Cola was done in 2016.

 

I wouldn't sell on Castro just yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The team is already backing off the idea of Sano returning May 1st. It sounds like he has gotten out of shape again while injured. Baldelli is quoted as wanting to make sure Sano gats back in playing shape before he faces any live action and is now targeting the 1st of May as when he will start playing in the Fort. A lot of other things can happen before that takes place in roster considerations.

 

???

 

To me that means playing baseball and timing and all. Playing shape. Out of shape again is a bit of a tangent to get from playing shape? Is this just your assumption, or is there some news and reports I have missed? Are you saying he gained 20 pounds and did nothing physical? - because I have heard/read just the opposite, that he continued to workout under Twins' guidance. And I have only read from the beginning that it wouldn't be until middle of May or so that we see him in the show. Please share links or something if you can. I would be very interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Twins have the best WAR in the AL at the catcher position with 0.4.

 

If Castro were not on the team, it would be 0.6. The closest team is at 0.3.

 

Of the three, Garver has been the best defender.

Garver is not the Twins best defensive catcher. He's barely passable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because I know Astudillo will not be the worst player on the roster at that time.

That wasn't the question I asked.

Because there are 9 positions to field, and not every player is capable of playing acceptably at every position, your 26th player will rarely be worse than all 25 players on the mlb roster.

And, not all players have the option to be sent down without being exposed to the other 29 teams.

If, for example, your "worst" player is only 1% worse than your second "worst" player, but can't be optioned, then it doesn't make sense to give away an asset for a 1% upgrade.

You have no idea which player will make sense to send down a month from now. Especially considering the tiny mlb sample size we are dealing with in regards to Astudillo, who I like, but is extremely far from proven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Garver is not the Twins best defensive catcher. He's barely passable.

 

I'm not sure that's true anymore.  He looks light years better.  And his bat presents a huge upside at the position for the Twins.

 

Jason Castro is low ceiling, low upside.  I'm sure his WAR looks great with a mix of dubious catching measurements, but his bat has been subpar to terrible for awhile now by far more concrete measurements.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cave will be sent down, he's just not getting enough regular at-bats and the team has at least six players with some degree of outfield experience.  Hell...seven if you count Sano when he returns!

 

They'll keep rolling this three catcher thing, but in regular 7 game bunches I hope Garver and Astudillo get at least 5 of those games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should be Castro but it won't be. Once Sano returns, Gonzalez becomes the utility IF'er so I don't see much need for Adrianza either. They seem reluctant to play Gonzalez on the OF for some reason so it's not going to be Cave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...