Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: Hello? Rochester... Please Send Help


Recommended Posts

While I wish we would, I can at least understand why we won’t sign Kimbrel at the price he’s asking for. However, if we don’t sign Keuchel, who’s said he’s willing to take a 1 year deal, than we should send just Mejia down to AAA where he and Romero can get stretched out because I’m really starting to doubt the quality of our rotation. I never trusted Perez as a starter in the first place, since I believe he’s better suited for the pen, but Odorizzi and Gibson?? If we can’t rely on those two, beating Cleveland seems highly unlikely, especially when Lindor gets back.

 

If the FO wants to improve the pen without having to sign Kimbrel, than I recommend that we either sign Madson, make a trade for an established reliever (Givens, Bradley, Conley, etc), or even speed up the timeline for some of our system’s promising bullpen arms like Moran, Quezada, Smeltzer, Stashak, Colina, and maybe even Alcala.

 

However, the season’s young, so for the time being shuttling pitchers back and forth from AAA should be enough to tread water until Reed and Magill return, although we shouldn’t just expect that they’ll be effective, which is why we need to start making some adjustments if we are to still consider ourselves “contenders.”

 

Then again, maybe I’m just overreacting and Jake Reed is the answer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trevor May leads the league in several Statcast categories.  He has the lowest Average Exit velocity against with 76.5MPH.  He has the lowest hard hit% with 5.6% (only allowed one hit above 95MPH).  His Barrels/Plate Appearance is 0.0%.

 

 

Between May, Rogers, Hildenberger, and Parker it is clear that we have no need for Kimbrel or any other closer candidate. Our bullpen is fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hildenberger optioned, Vasquez outrighted/DFA'd; Eades and Romero up.   

In four days: Stewart's starts in Odorizzi's spot, Odorizzi to the pen, the least effective reliever with options down.

 

I don't care if it's little league or major leagues.  If you cannot throw strikes you don't belong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of strange decisions.  I feel like the Romero experiment is like the Sano to the OF experiment.  Let Romero start and get him up here.  Odorizzi is now in his second year of proving he cannot go more than 4 innings.  Rookie relievers need to get settled and DeJong and Vasquez got crushed instead.  Then there is the Ehire pinch hit with Nelson Cruz on the bench.  So much to confuse this old brain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

From what we have seen of Perez, we might need a starter, too. Romero is my first choice for either role.

 

I agree, you just have to roll the dice with Romero. He's off to a decent start, just give him a chance. There's a high ceiling and he honestly can't be worse than what's happened already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hildenberger optioned, Vasquez outrighted/DFA'd; Eades and Romero up.   

In four days: Stewart's starts in Odorizzi's spot, Odorizzi to the pen, the least effective reliever with options down.

 

I don't care if it's little league or major leagues.  If you cannot throw strikes you don't belong.

 

Hildy just walked one guy last night, otherwise has been solid. No need to blow everything up after 10 games. We're 6-4 man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what Odorizzi was last year. 5 innings and he's done. A number 5 starter. Gibson and Pineda have only the ability to go about 5 right now also, though due to health. Prepare for an overworked bullpen, injuries, and an exposed lack of depth.

The majority of starts in MLB last year were five and one third..... Pitching has changed.

Edited by Mike Sixel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hildenberger optioned, Vasquez outrighted/DFA'd; Eades and Romero up.   

In four days: Stewart's starts in Odorizzi's spot, Odorizzi to the pen, the least effective reliever with options down.

 

I don't care if it's little league or major leagues.  If you cannot throw strikes you don't belong.

Why would they option Hildenberger at this point in time? Or outright Vasquez? Why wouldn't you keep the guy who hasn't allowed a run yet and just send Vasquez back down while calling Romero up if that's who you'd prefer to have? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The majority of starts in MLB last year were five and one third..... Pitching has changed.

 

That's a misleading stat. Yes, pitching has changed, but that's not totally why average innings per start is what it is. For 1 the Rays really throw the number off with their "opener" usage. They averaged just 3.9 innings per start, but that misleads as their actual starters were much better than that. Cleveland averaged over 6 innings per start because they have good starters. The problem with the Twins current pitching situation is that they built it to have starters who can go 6 and then have 3 lock down guys and 1 or 2 other guys who can fill in in their bullpen with just a couple random dudes to be the long and blow out guys. But their starters haven't nearly filled their role and it's put way more pressure on the guys who weren't supposed to be used often. When Berrios starts and then you can just get into a mix of Parker, May, and Rogers things look good. But when Odo and Gibson come up way short on expectations it forces Rocco to use guys in situations they weren't meant to be used in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That's a misleading stat. Yes, pitching has changed, but that's not totally why average innings per start is what it is. For 1 the Rays really throw the number off with their "opener" usage. They averaged just 3.9 innings per start, but that misleads as their actual starters were much better than that. Cleveland averaged over 6 innings per start because they have good starters. The problem with the Twins current pitching situation is that they built it to have starters who can go 6 and then have 3 lock down guys and 1 or 2 other guys who can fill in in their bullpen with just a couple random dudes to be the long and blow out guys. But their starters haven't nearly filled their role and it's put way more pressure on the guys who weren't supposed to be used often. When Berrios starts and then you can just get into a mix of Parker, May, and Rogers things look good. But when Odo and Gibson come up way short on expectations it forces Rocco to use guys in situations they weren't meant to be used in.

Every reliever, on every team, will end up pitching important innings. You can't just use the top 3 day after day and expect them to carry the load. Even if Odo and Gibson go 7, you still need bullpen coverage on those days, and every day the Twins play. Using only the top end in every close game is unworkable.

 

Good bullpens have multiple good arms, because all arms get used, and used in situations that matter.

 

Demanding more from the starters is a nice thought, but that was going to be difficult to achieve for this year's Twins team. However, adding bullpen arms was simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Trevor May leads the league in several Statcast categories.  He has the lowest Average Exit velocity against with 76.5MPH.  He has the lowest hard hit% with 5.6% (only allowed one hit above 95MPH).  His Barrels/Plate Appearance is 0.0%.

 

 

Between May, Rogers, Hildenberger, and Parker it is clear that we have no need for Kimbrel or any other closer candidate. Our bullpen is fine. 

 

I'm with you on May. I'm a fan of Rogers and Parker has looked better from his first couple of shakey outings but the jury is still out. Hildenberger? Maybe, I'm still on the fence after last year.

 

But even if all four of those guys are good to great, there's always room for bullpen improvement, ask the A's last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Every reliever, on every team, will end up pitching important innings. You can't just use the top 3 day after day and expect them to carry the load. Even if Odo and Gibson go 7, you still need bullpen coverage on those days, and every day the Twins play. Using only the top end in every close game is unworkable.

 

Good bullpens have multiple good arms, because all arms get used, and used in situations that matter.

 

Demanding more from the starters is a nice thought, but that was going to be difficult to achieve for this year's Twins team. However, adding bullpen arms was simple.

Let's start with 90 wins as our goal. Let's say we only get 6 innings out of our starters in all 90 of those games. That means we need 270 innings worth of bullpen usage in those games. If you have 4 guys who throw all of those innings they're all throwing 67.5 innings.

 

That's obviously a ridiculously perfect situation, but that's the plan you build for when you're a small to midmarket team because it's not sustainable to pay bullpen guys big money because they're too volatile. The argument I made in my post was you want 3 shut down type guys to lock down sure wins. Then you have 1 or 2 others are quite reliable. That's 4 or 5 guys. Yes, every guy in the pen will throw innings, but the plan is to use those 4 or 5 in the "important innings." 

 

Good bullpens do have multiple good arms, 3-5 of them. They don't have 8 guys that they expect to use regularly in high leverage situations. They have 3-5 and then pop some of those other few in there in the 6th or 7th in stretches where the team is in a bunch of close games. But that's only a few stretches of the season. Vasquez was brutal last night, yes. But to act like the bullpen is just collapsing right now is inaccurate. Harper, Hildy, and May haven't allowed runs yet. Rogers and Parker have allowed 1. That's 2 runs in 21+ innings. That's your 4 guys you're counting on at the end of games and 1 random guy. The expectation is that Romero will come up and be a 5th end of game guy. What else do you realistically want from a bullpen? This article and thread have people acting like the season is over because some random dude the team was never counting on came in and was absolutely brutal in 1 game. But in reality the bullpen is doing it's job. It's not doing the extra stuff the starters are forcing it to try to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trevor May leads the league in several Statcast categories. He has the lowest Average Exit velocity against with 76.5MPH. He has the lowest hard hit% with 5.6% (only allowed one hit above 95MPH). His Barrels/Plate Appearance is 0.0%.

 

 

Between May, Rogers, Hildenberger, and Parker it is clear that we have no need for Kimbrel or any other closer candidate. Our bullpen is fine.

4 guys isn’t enough. They can’t all pitch every night there is a lead to protect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I agree on 3 of those 4, but disagree that our bullpen is fine. We need depth. The problem is that to win games we are going to have to over pitch Rogers, May and Parker. Hildenberger is a depth guy - he's frankly not that good, lets in most of the runners he inherits, but he's good enough to be the # 6 or 7 guy in a 7 man bullpen. Good enough to be in MLB, not good enough to be an important cog in a contending team's bullpen. We only have 3 of those guys. 

 

We need 4 or 5  quality BP arms PLUS 2 or 3 depth guys. We have 3 quality arms in May, Rogers and Parker, and 1 depth guy in Hildenberger IMHO. I think Odorizzi could be a "quality" BP arm and Perez a depth/maybe quality guy. Maybe Harper or Morin finishes off the group now, with Eades, Romero and/or Littel coming in a month or two for anyone who isn't effective or the inevitable injuries.   

 

Sooo, I would move Odo to the BP and leave Perez there, and send Vasquez down. Now we need two starters. If we're going to sign a FA, sign Kuechel on a 1 or 2 year deal (he now says he'll take that) for one guy. Bring up Stewart as the #5 starter. If no Kuechel or while he's building up arm strength, add Romero or Littel to the starting rotation. I'd vote Romero but I don't know where he is in terms of innings, etc. 

 

To me, the better plan to make the less effective starters into relievers where they may be more effective and take our chances with young starters. That's where we have some talent, not in the bullpen. 

Vasquez deserves more chances, hopefully we don't make a habit out of bringing in rookies with the bases loaded to face the top of the order. That was not a good choice in hindsight.  I'm not giving up on De Jong after one bad inning either.

 

Pitching depth is a major strength for us this year.  It's not front of the rotation/back of the bullpen depth but we have good depth.  If Berrios, Pineda, and Gibson stay mostly healthy and pitch decent we have nothing to worry about. 

 

Hildenberger should be a fine bullpen piece.  He has battled inconsistencies in his first 2 seasons but I am confident he will have a good year.

 

No signings, no trades (until July), this is our squad.  Leave the rotation (with Perez) the way it is until an injury occurs.  Our offense will be great and our pitching will be fine (average).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Seth;

 

I have questions as opposed to opinions:

 

1. You wrote: "The Twins wanted to call up Zack Littell last weekend but because the season was not yet ten days old, they were unable to." Might I ask why? Is it an IL thing?

 

2. "Following the game, he (DeYong)was returned to Rochester since he would be unable to pitch for the Twins for several days.

Is this because he threw 46 pitches?

 

3. I know you are being thorough, but Adams 6.49 ERA, Duffy at 4.56, Guilmet at 9.27 doesn't instill confidence. Seth, do think any of these could actually add value to the Twins?

 

4. I'd love to hear your opinion on Magill and / or Reed. Are they an improvement?

 

Finally, when the populous of earth decides to make me Emperor, I'll make you head of the Twins. What would you recommend about pitching?

 

4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And a 2R single for a total of -.120 WPA.  He let 3 runs in and got one hitter out.  Not sure in what kind of universe this is "solid"...

 

I'll agree he was not so great last night. But he's had 5 other appearances and has been perfect. So you're willing to just give up on Hildy because of one bad outing? That's just so shortsighted, man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't the first time Odorizzi had a lights out game but everything fell apart in an epic fashion.

 

Most of us complained that the previous d00d didn't know when to pull pitchers ... but I think even he would have pulled people sooner than this.

 

Baldell might be trying to be too nice. I suspect this will change after a few more games like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Reach out to Bud Norris & Jim Johnson. Both still unsigned and both have the ability to close if needed.

 

The Nationals deal with Norris fell through because they feel he's at least a month away from contributing.

 

I'd pass on Johnson, he can't strike anyone out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. You wrote: "The Twins wanted to call up Zack Littell last weekend but because the season was not yet ten days old, they were unable to." Might I ask why? Is it an IL thing?

 

Players who are optioned to the minors have to spend at least 10 days there (or the first 10 days of the season, in this case) before they are eligible to return to MLB. (With the exception if someone goes on the DL/IL.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Last night, we needed a fireman. We didn't have one unfortunately...

 

Kimbrel would certainly have his bad moments, and even if he signed now, he woudln't be ready for a few weeks at best... Regardless, we needed him last night. 

 

We should have signed him. We still could... 

A fireman who goes to the scene then wets his pants is not the answer but it does mean his intentions were good.

Edited by ScrapTheNickname
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

Love Rocco so far, but last night I didn't agree with how he used his bullpen. Bringing in an inexperienced guy with the bases loaded in a 1-0 game would have been my last choice. He should have been used the way de Jong was the night before, in a game that was out of reach, or at least in a situation with empty bases. Not being able to throw strikes is a sign of nerves...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Not solid. Let's face it. Hildenberger started out hot, hitters saw him a few times, and he cooled off. Since then, he's been a decent reliever who can be a back end bullpen guy. He tends to let inherited runners score and he's not a guy we can regularly put in late inning crucial situations. He's more of a depth guy - the number 5, 6 or 7 BP guy in a 7 or 8 man bullpen. He's fine to keep (especially considering our other options) but he can't be one of the the top 4-5 guys to carry this bullpen, at least not now.

 

 

Hildenberger has inherited 11 runners already this season. That’s almost half the total number of inherited runners for the entire team (25). Yesterday was the first time ANY of them scored. Hildenberger had a bad game, period. It happens. Just don’t make inaccurate statements that make him out to be worse than he is. He was very good with inherited runners in 2017, not so much last year. Overall, his career mark is 36% scoring. By way of comparison, Addison Reed has allowed 41% of inherited runners to score.

 

 

Bottom line: Hildenberger is absolutely one of the key guys in the pen this year.

Edited by yarnivek1972
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Why would they option Hildenberger at this point in time? Or outright Vasquez? Why wouldn't you keep the guy who hasn't allowed a run yet and just send Vasquez back down while calling Romero up if that's who you'd prefer to have? 

 

Hildenberger did allow runs last night... 3/3 inherited runners scored. They had not scored until he was on the mound. Just because it doesn't count on his ERA doesn't mean he hasn't allowed a run! He allowed 3 last night.

 

I'm not saying to option him. Not at all. Inherited runs count, none the less.

Edited by h2oface
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...