Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Where are they now? Ex-Twins in 2019


Doctor Wu

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 466
  • Created
  • Last Reply

 

Aaron Hicks signs a 7/$70 million extension with the Yanks. That means he's signed through his (GASP!) age 36 season.

Something's fishy about this. I can't imagine the Yankees wanting him for more than 3-4 seasons. If I were the league/players association, I would be looking at this as a round about way of manipulating luxury tax penalties in the future. The team probably wants him for 4/70, but offered the extra years to keep the AAV down and will bench/platoon/release/dump him when they bring in an upgrade to his spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Something's fishy about this. I can't imagine the Yankees wanting him for more than 3-4 seasons. If I were the league/players association, I would be looking at this as a round about way of manipulating luxury tax penalties in the future. The team probably wants him for 4/70, but offered the extra years to keep the AAV down and will bench/platoon/release/dump him when they bring in an upgrade to his spot.

Why would Hicks agree to such a deal, though? Wouldn't he rather get the same $70 mil and be a FA again at age 33 rather than age 36? He's got some leverage, he was already getting $6 mil this year and was going to be a free agent very soon.

 

Frankly, with a $6 mil final arbitration salary, it's not unreasonable from his perspective to lock in 6/64 for his age 30-35 seasons in this market. As much as that arb salary is held down by his poor career start, that same poor career start would probably hold him back in FA next winter too (shorter track record, consistency questions).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cha ching. Remember when he was going to stop being a switch hitter? Kinda makes you want to be patient with Buxton etc

Hicks in his first season at the MLB level had a 27% K rate and a 16% in his final season as a Twin.

 

Buxton (even throwing out last year) went from a K rate of 32 to 29%.

 

Failing to see improvement (and help it along) is part of the reason why this team has a different GM and field manager than when Hicks played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pedro Florimon now in camp with the Atlanta Braves. He went 1-2 yesterday, playing third base, but had an error. Also with Atlanta is outfielder Ryan LaMarre. Was it only last year that he made the Twins opening day roster after a torrid spring training?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Logan Foresythe signs an milb with the Rangers.

I had to think about that one. Oh yeah, he came over in that Dozier trade late last year. His tenure with the Twins was so brief that I'd already forgotten about him! Speaking of forgotten acquisitions, has any team picked up Logan Morrison yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably the most notable is Dozier signing with the Washington Nationals for $9M.

 

Why did Dozier decline last year after going on a 29 HR tear the second half of 2016? He scored over a 100 runs 4 years in a row despite one year having a .307 OBP. A rebound candidate?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't you glad you didn't sign Garza that same offseason?

The Garza deal started a little better, but it seemed to end in a similar place.

 

FWIW, Fangraphs has Garza as worth 5.4 fWAR in Milwaukee, or 1.7 fWAR per 30 starts, based on his peripherals; meanwhile, B-Ref has him at -0.9 bWAR for the same period. He really started getting knocked around on balls in play with the Brewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

TAMPA, Fla. – Brett Gardner came back to the Yankees early in the offseason for a $2-million pay cut. At age 35 and coming off a down season, he could have been looking at a cut in playing time, too.
But the growing concern that Aaron Hicks might have to start the season on the injured list because of a lower-back injury has Gardner back in two familiar places in a sizzling spring training: centerfield and the leadoff spot.

 

I am saying it first right here.  Hicks will not make it through the life of that contract.  No way, no how

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I am saying it first right here.  Hicks will not make it through the life of that contract.  No way, no how

Won't make it through alive? :)

 

I think we've been through this before, but I don't think anyone expects Hicks to "make it through" in the sense of being particularly valuable in his age 35 season. I'm guessing the Yankees hope for some plus performance in the first few years, and they can easily eat the last few years if necessary.

 

Although even that hope is being tested this spring. The Yankees signed two big extensions this spring -- Hicks and Severino -- and both are on the shelf right now. (Not that I'm complaining about bad luck hitting the Yankees!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TAMPA, Fla. – Brett Gardner came back to the Yankees early in the offseason for a $2-million pay cut. At age 35 and coming off a down season, he could have been looking at a cut in playing time, too.

But the growing concern that Aaron Hicks might have to start the season on the injured list because of a lower-back injury has Gardner back in two familiar places in a sizzling spring training: centerfield and the leadoff spot.

 

I am saying it first right here. Hicks will not make it through the life of that contract. No way, no how

Because the Yankees would care about that why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Because the Yankees would care about that why?

Care about what why?  You're being snarky with me about them caring about my opinion being expressed on Twins Daily or are you saying they can absorb the contract?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TAMPA, Fla. – Brett Gardner came back to the Yankees early in the offseason for a $2-million pay cut. At age 35 and coming off a down season, he could have been looking at a cut in playing time, too.

But the growing concern that Aaron Hicks might have to start the season on the injured list because of a lower-back injury has Gardner back in two familiar places in a sizzling spring training: centerfield and the leadoff spot.

 

I am saying it first right here. Hicks will not make it through the life of that contract. No way, no how

WTH - Aaron Hicks with a $70 million deal. That is wild stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Won't make it through alive? :)

 

I think we've been through this before, but I don't think anyone expects Hicks to "make it through" in the sense of being particularly valuable in his age 35 season. I'm guessing the Yankees hope for some plus performance in the first few years, and they can easily eat the last few years if necessary.

 

Although even that hope is being tested this spring. The Yankees signed two big extensions this spring -- Hicks and Severino -- and both are on the shelf right now. (Not that I'm complaining about bad luck hitting the Yankees!)

Your take in the bolded part is basically what the Yankees believe, but I don't think they are going to get as much as they now hope for.  I am in complete agreement with you in the underlined.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

WTH - Aaron Hicks with a $70 million deal. That is wild stuff.

It reminds me of the Gary Matthews Jr. deal in some ways. Not exactly sure how one good year of production earns a guy that much.  Hicks really is not an everyday player

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Your take in the bolded part is basically what the Yankees believe, but I don't think they are going to get as much as they now hope for.  I am in complete agreement with you in the underlined.

I think all of us Twins fan would agree with that underlined part! Bad luck striking the Yankees is good news!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

It reminds me of the Gary Matthews Jr. deal in some ways. Not exactly sure how one good year of production earns a guy that much.  Hicks really is not an everyday player

Yeah, that Gary Matthews Jr. deal was a stinker, and totally perplexing at the time, and even  more so in retrospect. But I would rate Hicks as a much better all around player than Matthews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It reminds me of the Gary Matthews Jr. deal in some ways. Not exactly sure how one good year of production earns a guy that much. Hicks really is not an everyday player

Like Hicks, Matthews Jr. wasn't any good until age 27.

 

But unlike Hicks, Matthews Jr. got his big contract at age 32. Hicks is only 29.

 

If Hicks performs like Matthews Jr did from age 29-31 (10.2 WAR), that would largely justify the whole contract, regardless of what he does from age 32-35. Pretty sure that's the Yankee thought process here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...