Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: Rundown: Cruz, Cahill, Soria and Ramos


Recommended Posts

FanCred's Jon Heyman reported Monday that the Twins were in the mix for Nelson Cruz. New Twins beat writer for MLB.com Do-Hyoung Park confirmed and added that there was mutual interest between Cruz and the Twins. Darren Wolfson of KSTP also revealed that the Twins were kicking the tires on Joakim Soria, Trevor Cahill and Wilson Ramos.

 

So that's four names we've got to dissect, let's get into it.Nelson Cruz? But isn't he, like, really old? This was probably what Seattle Mariners fans were asking when their team signed him four years ago. Cruz is 38 now, but he's somehow been able to avoid a decline and was still among the best power hitters in baseball last season.

 

Cruz hit .256/.342/.509 (.850 OPS) with 37 home runs for Seattle last season, but that was a 74-point drop in his OPS from the prior year. Why? Well, it definitely doesn't have anything to do with how hard he hit the ball.

 

Cruz led the league in average exit velocity (minimum 300 batted ball events) at 93.9 mph and was fourth in hard hit % at 51.3, per Baseball Savant. His hard hit rate per FanGraphs was 42.3 percent, a career high. His BABIP, however, was just .264, the 22nd-lowest mark among qualified hitters. Cruz has a career .305 BABIP.

 

Download attachment: CruzExitVelo3.png

 

The man they call Boomstick has also hit for power in Safeco, no easy task, but his .295/.372/.527 (.900) line on the road was even more impressive last year. He's also a .325/.355/.667 (1.022 OPS) hitter in 124 career plate appearances at Target Field.

 

Cruz had a 132 DRC+ last season according to Baseball Prospectus. That ranks 24th among all hitters with at least 400 PAs. Eddie Rosario led the Twins with a 113 DRC+ last season.

 

No matter the track record, his age has to be a concern, but I'm willing to believe that Cruz can be a well above average middle of the lineup hitter for a couple more years. Only eight players hit more home runs than Cruz last season, and he still isn't having to completely sell out for that power. His strikeout rate (20.6) was comfortably below league average (22.3).

 

MLB Trade Rumors actually predicted the Twins would sign Cruz, putting the expected contract at two years, $30 million. That's probably the cheapest a hitter of this caliber is going to be acquired. The Twins aren't going to spend on Bryce Harper or Manny Machado and they didn't trade for Paul Goldschmidt or Robinson Cano. You get left with a 38-year-old (and that's if you're lucky).

 

I'd expect a Cruz signing would almost certainly result in the end of Tyler Austin's stay in Minnesota. It would be awfully difficult to fit Cruz, C.J. Cron and Austin (who is out of options) all on the same 25-man roster.

 

Trevor Cahill had a strong season in his second stay with the A's, pitching to a 3.76 ERA and 1.19 WHIP, but he was much better at home than on the road. In fact, Cahill has been especially comfortable at the Oakland Coliseum over his career. In 383 innings in Oakland, Cahill has a 3.01 ERA. In his other 960 1/3 innings, he has a 4.50 ERA. But one skill that should translate anywhere is his ability to induce ground balls.

 

Among the pitchers to log 190 innings over the past two seasons (138), Cahill's 54.4 GB% ranked eighth. He also had a career-high 11.7 swinging strike rate, which ranks 33rd among the 140 pitchers who threw at least 100 innings in 2018. Kyle Gibson was at 11.5 and Jose Berrios 11.3.

 

Download attachment: Screenshot 2018-12-10 at 8.25.33 PM.png

 

Those ballpark splits worry me, but I still think Cahill could be a boost to the 2019 Twins rotation. MLB Trade Rumors projected him to fetch a two year, $22 million deal.

 

I mentioned in a rundown last week how I felt Joakim Soria was the one reliever who I felt best fit with the Twins in terms of both need and expected salary. He's had a few slip ups, but in terms of bullpen arms he's been pretty reliable over his career. Both his walk rate and strikeout rate have been trending the right direction each of the past three seasons. Among the pitchers to log 60 innings in 2018 (273), Soria's 4.69 K:BB ratio was tied with Taylor Rogers for 27th place.

 

I like the idea of the Twins signing Soria, who has 220 career saves, to be the closer. He performed nicely in that role for the White Sox last season before being traded over to Milwaukee. He's 34-years-old, so fastball velocity will be a concern, but he did buck a recent trend of losing velo as the season progressed last year.

 

Download attachment: SoriaVelo.jpeg

 

Soria's expected contract is two years, $18 million, per MLB Trade Rumors. The Twins would need to further address the bullpen, in my opinion, but this would be a start.

 

Finally, Wilson Ramos ... we know all too well this guy has been good when healthy. The former Twins prospect cranked it up a notch last year, hitting .306/.358/.487 (.845) for the Rays and Phillies. Catchers are so difficult to find, so I have a hard time believing Ramos, 31, is going to be available at a discount. MLB Trade Rumors had him signing for three years and $36 million.

 

It's hard to imagine the Twins making that kind of a commitment to a catcher, given they have Jason Castro and Mitch Garver (and Willians Astudillo), but who knows? Castro is only under contract for one more season and, as Nick pointed out last week, Garver has some injury concerns right now. So I suppose it could happen.

 

OK, now it's your turn. What do you think about these guys?

 

Click here to view the article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Twins, 

 

I give Wilson Ramos a hard pass.

 

I think your time will be better served by overpaying for a reliever with horrible sabermetrics that would pass my eye test.

 

Call me if you are interested in any of my other recommendations. 

 

You can find me on my couch.

 

Love Always,

 

Bill Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

 

Tired of dumpster diving. 

 

Arms, arms and more arms.

 

Either core gets its act together next season or the team is blown up and the management team starts over. 

 

The core players need to prove they are core players, otherwise these signings are lipstick on a pig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would like to see them sign Cruz. But would it really mean the end for Austin? A four person bench; catcher, MI, OF, 1B/DH type? I kind of feel like Austin has some nice upside.

 

As for the others, Soria, sure. Others, not as sure. Ramos would be an upgrade, but Garver thrived last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that they are all projected to get 2 year deals in the same price range. Also interesting that none of them blocks any prospects even beyond that window. And who said dumpster-diving? All four are actual talents, with multiple years of proven performance including 2018. The only reason for their affordability is they are part of no one's five year plan. I've seen worse uses of payroll and roster spots in these parts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been hesitant on Cruz because he is only a DH and I like the potential of Austin. But to be honest, I wouldn't dislike the move for 2019 at least, with Rooker and Khiriloff moving up soon, hopefully. They say there is nothing wrong with a 1yr contract. In reality, if you really think about it, you are signing Cruz for 2019. 2020 becomes his "1yr deal" if things fall in to place.

 

Meh on Cahill. Shouldn't we be spending more time on the prospects at hand?

 

Soria is a better version of Rodney. I'd be fine with this. I'd rather someone younger on a 3yr, such as Familia, for example, and work a on a slightly cheaper 2yr for $7-8M, for an aged Soria. Would that work? Not sure. But the FA market has changed, and there is an abundance of potential arms out there.

 

I like Garver and his potential, as long as he is healthy and there are no concussion concerns. I like Castro as an experienced leader and LH platoon option. Also a fan of Astudillo behind the plate and as a utility option. But come on, if you could add a healthy 31yo Ramos, you'd have to consider it wouldn't you? I would...if the price was right.

 

To the mat, maybe on Cruz, no to Cahill, yes to Soria, maybe on Ramos, eating Castro's contract for 1 year.

 

I honestly think Cruz will end up singing for less. Either way, it means trading Austin, or trying to sneak him through waivers for AAA, aren't we better signing McCutchen or Brantley for close to the same money? DH, OF, 1B, we couldn't find room for one of them and the guys on hand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 


I can't see any way Cron, Austin, and Cruz are all on the roster. So Austin would be one and done.

 

Bingo. In a vacuum, Cruz brings a impact bat to our lineup but not without the expense of someone else. If Austin has to be dumped for it, it happens, I get it. But I do think people need to understand that there's no way in 2018 baseball you can fit all of those one dimensional pieces onto a roster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Would like to see them sign Cruz. But would it really mean the end for Austin? A four person bench; catcher, MI, OF, 1B/DH type? I kind of feel like Austin has some nice upside.

I wouldn't expect any team to carry a four-man bench in 2019 for long. Might work in the early goings with all the extra off days, but there will come a time when you need that extra pitcher.

 

With Twins having a first-time manager, first-time MLB pitching coach and first-time bullpen coach I'd think it'd be a wise idea to give them that extra arm for wiggle room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some food for thought:

 

2018 ERA

3.62 Gibson

3.76 Cahill

3.84 Berrios

4.49 Odorizzi

 

2018 FIP

3.54 Cahill

3.90 Berrios

4.13 Gibson

4.20 Odorizzi

 

2018 WHIP

1.14 Berrios

1.19 Cahill

1.30 Gibson

1.34 Odorizzi

 

2018 K:BB

3.31 Berrios

2.44 Cahill

2.31 Odorizzi

2.27 Gibson

 

The other top FA SPs available are Keuchel (who has a qualifying offer), Happ, Kikuchi (though he sounds more interested in playing on the west coast), Morton (though he sounds more interested in either staying in Houston or playing on the east coast), Gio, Anibal and Matt Harvey. I think Cahill represents a solid option in that group in terms of performance and availability. 

 

They obviously also have the option of trying to trade for a pitcher, but you gotta give something to get something. If the Twins are intent on treating 2019 as an evaluation year, I can't imagine they're motivated to trade away any prospects. We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that some folks won't dig the argument, but it would be nice to have a veteran presence like Cruz around to kind of keep things in perspective so to speak. I mean he is a guy with a real resume and not just a one year he did blah blah blah blah.

 

I recall with great fondness when the 87 Twins grabbed Don Baylor from the scrap yard. His presence was a big plus--not to mention his huge home run in game five of the World Series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be interested in all of them, especially Cruz who gets on base in addition to hitting the ball a mile. I certainly wouldn't pass up Cruz in order to hold a roster spot for Tyler Austin, who I think ain't gonna be anything other than a guy.

 

I don't see Ramos happening, but considering the concerns over whether Garver can continue to catch with the concussion issues and Castro coming off a significant knee injury it's worth exploring.

 

(I hate hate hate the fact that teams are running with 13 pitchers. Especially considering at least one of those guys isn't going to get used more than once a week and occasionally will go 2 weeks without an appearance and possibly 3 without a meaningful one. I'd rather see a rule limiting the number of pitchers on a roster to 12 than banning the shift.)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Interesting that they are all projected to get 2 year deals in the same price range. Also interesting that none of them blocks any prospects even beyond that window. And who said dumpster-diving? All four are actual talents, with multiple years of proven performance including 2018. The only reason for their affordability is they are part of no one's five year plan. I've seen worse uses of payroll and roster spots in these parts

I said dumpster diving because of the age of all the people mentioned. I know I could be way off base but this just seems like more of the same that has gone on in the past. Last year, I think, was a lost year for the new FO, in that too many things went wrong for them to really find out what kind of players they have. I just can't see the Twins competing this year and I don't see how these signings help the Twins going forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I said dumpster diving because of the age of all the people mentioned. I know I could be way off base but this just seems like more of the same that has gone on in the past. Last year, I think, was a lost year for the new FO, in that too many things went wrong for them to really find out what kind of players they have. I just can't see the Twins competing this year and I don't see how these signings help the Twins going forward. 

 

I think to some extent, we should probably reconsider what we mean by dumpster diving. That term brings back memories of Terry Ryan going out and signing the Jason Tyners and Mike Pelfrey's of the world who all had incredibly limited upsides and not even a high floor. 

 

So far, what I've seen out of this front office is an attempt to get guys with pretty reasonable ceilings. Morrison may not have worked out, but that was a smart get. Same with Lynn, though I'd argue that other an April, he was pretty good and was turned into prospects. 

 

Every single name on this list certainly seems defensible. All of those guys (except maybe Cahill) are reasonable bets to be above average regulars. I personally don't care if they target those types of guys, I think that's smart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sano cannot play 3B - injuries, etc. his options are 1B or DH. Right now there is Austin, Cron, Cave (if not starting), Garver (if not starting or wiped out by concussion), and Sano if not at 3B. I am not against Cruz, but what are the plans for all these contingencies?

The Twins can sign Cruz and I believe his bat will play but it will indirectly cause issues with other positions due to roster space as you suggest.

 

Cruz makes more sense for a team like the Rays who can move Bauers to the OF or AAA. And move Wendle and Robertson around. If Cruz is signed... the Twins must move Austin to the OF or release Cron or Austin to accommodate and you are still sitting there with an absolute undeniable need for Sano to stay healthy and productive.

 

I’m ok with Cruz and would love the talent with the bat but only under the condition that the dominoes that need to follow the signing happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can add talent to the team I am all for it - I think we need to mix some things up because I am real worried we have too many one-dimensional players.   Ranked in order of preference:

 

Soria - we need a couple of bullpen arms - Soria qualifies as a quality add on a 2 year deal

 

Cruz > Austin  in my worthless opinion.     Cruz has power and gets on base even for an old guy.  Austin has power - can either play a position well? 

 

Cahill looks like a nice arm to add - what are the odds our current 4 starting pitchers pitchers make it through the year healthy?    Caveat - not sure what they are doing with the opener/primary role this year but that would be a good way to get some of our younger pitchers some innings this upcoming year like Romero, Mejia, Gonsalves and Stewart in the 5th spot.  

 

Ramos - if they have concerns about Garver's concussion history and him being able to catch regularly then Ramos would be a nice signing.   Not sure where that would leave Garver though as we have ample folks at 1B/DH  but honestly Garver may be the best hitter out of the bunch of them.   

 

The other thing it looks like is Sano has to get in good shape and has to play 3B.  We don't have a dependable contingency plan and we are full of 1B/DH types.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want to state that the book on Austin hasn’t been written yet. 347 AB’s is maybe a chapter. Burning through minor league options with the Yankees is typical Yankee operational style.

 

I’ll make no assumptions of success or failure because he hasn’t been given the full chance yet. All I know is that he looked decent during short window with us and he makes minimum wage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think any of these players would really be blocking up and coming stud players. They're all productive proven major leaguers that we could get for relatively cheap and help right away in 2019. I especially like the idea of Cruz with his big right handed bat mashing homers into the left field porch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...