Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: MIN 4, DET 3: Austin Homers, Hildy Survives Save Chance


Recommended Posts

 

What's your plan for that 5th chance? A home run every time? :)

 

You know me.

 

I don't like the structure of a starting 9.

I don't like the structure of players only playing one position. 

I don't like the structure of a traditional bullpen.

 

No way I'm gonna structure that 5th AB for him... I'm just gonna be happy it's no longer a strike out.  :)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You know me.

 

I don't like the structure of a starting 9.

I don't like the structure of players only playing one position. 

I don't like the structure of a traditional bullpen.

 

No way I'm gonna structure that 5th AB for him... I'm just gonna be happy it's no longer a strike out.  :)

I'm partial to the structure of home runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we consider that Castellanos is probably the biggest threat in the Tigers lineup, May was definitely brought in during the "high leverage" situation.

 

I'm not going to defend the overuse of Hildenberger or the call to use him when he has obviously been getting shelled, but a couple things to consider:

 

1) The poster calling Molitor an idiot for using Hildenberger against left-handed hitters must not have noticed that Martinez and Goodrum are both switch-hitters.  That argument needs at least more development.

 

2) Hildenberger's change-up has been the pitch that's been getting drilled. I think hitters are sitting on it, and it's been the frisbee that they're looking for.  He did ditch that pitch after the Goodrum bomb.  Using his only sinking fastball, which did have some movement, during what became a high leverage situation, he actually was quite effective.  He probably can't go with being a one-pitch pitcher for the balance of the season, but in this situation, it was the right move.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I suspect the answer to this question will depend on how many RH pitchers he faces.

 

Right now in a small sample size of 6 AB's... It's looking like the answer to this question will depend on how many balls are thrown low in the zone. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we consider that Castellanos is probably the biggest threat in the Tigers lineup, May was definitely brought in during the "high leverage" situation.

 

I'm not going to defend the overuse of Hildenberger or the call to use him when he has obviously been getting shelled, but a couple things to consider:

 

1) The poster calling Molitor an idiot for using Hildenberger against left-handed hitters must not have noticed that Martinez and Goodrum are both switch-hitters. That argument needs at least more development.

 

2) Hildenberger's change-up has been the pitch that's been getting drilled. I think hitters are sitting on it, and it's been the frisbee that they're looking for. He did ditch that pitch after the Goodrum bomb. Using his only sinking fastball, which did have some movement, during what became a high leverage situation, he actually was quite effective. He probably can't go with being a one-pitch pitcher for the balance of the season, but in this situation, it was the right move.

HELLO = Yes, I DO KNOW they are switch hitters. From which side do they bat when a RHP is on the mound? If a LHP was used instead of Hildy, both those switch hitters would have been turned around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Is there anybody on the planet, except for maybe MoY, who isn't willing to give Trevor MAY a shot in the closer role? Maybe he just got the wrong Trevor in the wrong inning.

Or maybe it's just better to have a burned-up sidewinder who's put up a WHIP over 2.00, and ERA of 12+ lately?

I really like May, as well. The thing about Hildy, though, is that of the 12 runs he's given up in the past 9.2 innings in 10 games, none of them cost us a win except for the Lindor walkoff HR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

HELLO = Yes, I DO KNOW they are switch hitters. From which side do they bat when a RHP is on the mound? If a LHP was used instead of Hildy, both those switch hitters would have been turned around.

 

I'm not trying to start anything I promise since you are already capitalizing...

 

But Both Martinez and Goodrum have hit left-handers better this year and V-Mart also has hit left-handers better for his vast career... so I'm not sure what you gain by turning them around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like May, as well. The thing about Hildy, though, is that of the 12 runs he's given up in the past 9.2 innings in 10 games, none of them cost us a win except for the Lindor walkoff HR.

Does that speak to the pitcher's craftiness, or to the manager not putting him in when a run would matter? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not trying to start anything I promise since you are already capitalizing...

 

But Both Martinez and Goodrum have hit left-handers better this year and V-Mart also has hit left-handers better for his vast career... so I'm not sure what you gain by turning them around.

And to add to that, Hildy is actually better against lefties, both this year and last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not the traditional closer role guy so I don't spend a lot of time worrying about who is in the 9th.

 

If I had to choose, I like low WHIP guys in the 9th and Hildenberger used to be that prior to this deep funk he is in so I'm not completely in opposition to this being his role... I'm just more in opposition of the static role itself.

 

Because sometimes you have a 3 run lead in the 9th where it makes sense to give Brandon Workman the ball and sometimes you have a 1 run lead in the 7th where it makes sense to give Craig Kimbrel the ball. Just pitching Kimbrel in the 9th exclusively if it's a 3 run lead or a 1 run lead is just another form of auto-pilot managing that I am a little sick of at the moment.

 

I understand that as long as players are compensated for saves, the players will demand the role and this puts me firmly against the wind but I'm pointing this out to say that I don't care if Hildy is our closer.

 

So with that said and knowing that Molitor doesn't share my thoughts on the subject and knowing that he is going to require a 9th inning guy. The selection of Hildenberger is interesting. Hildy is in a deep funk and Molitor went there anyway.

 

Not surprising... Molitor is pretty consistent, he has his chosen guys and he is going with those guys come hell or high water.

Are they though?

 

Addison Reed was guaranteed 4 times the money that Fernando Rodney was. Even Duke was guaranteed $ 2 mil to Rodney’s $4 mil and change. He’s just a loogy.

 

Maybe, just maybe, the market is catching on to what kind of relievers are truly valuable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Are they though?

Addison Reed was guaranteed 4 times the money that Fernando Rodney was. Even Duke was guaranteed $ 2 mil to Rodney’s $4 mil and change. He’s just a loogy.

Maybe, just maybe, the market is catching on to what kind of relievers are truly valuable.

 

I agree that adjustments have been trending the figures together but the Closer still makes the money. In Arbitration ruling and Free Agent Deals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Has May expressed that recently? I wonder if he has changed his tune at all after his surgery. At the very least, he might be sick of the back-and-forth, which another return to starting now would represent.

I'm also guessing if the choice is starting in Rochester, or relieving in Minneapolis, he picks the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm also guessing if the choice is starting in Rochester, or relieving in Minneapolis, he picks the latter.

True, although May will finally be out of options next spring, so he can be reasonably confident he's not going back to Rochester anymore (he would be claimed if we tried to waive him).

 

Not that it gives him much leverage to demand starting or anything. And FWIW, while he has spoken of a preference for starting in the past, he has moved to the pen in 2015, 2016, and now in 2018 without incident as fas as I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also guessing if the choice is starting in Rochester, or relieving in Minneapolis, he picks the latter.

So it's probably thumbs down from him also on the manager's chair in Chattanooga, or an ownership stake in Elizabethton? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...