Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Twins Daily

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

I'd like to see more balls in play

Featured Replies

http://www.espn.com/blog/buster-olney/insider/post/_/id/18486/olney-have-big-swings-big-flies-and-big-whiffs-broken-baseball

 

Count me among those who liked baseball better back in the day when there were more balls in play. More stolen bases, more hit and runs, and yes, even more bunts.

 

I believe MLB needs to do something to start reducing the amount of K's.  

What can the league do, realistically?

If teams have data showing them that those things you suggest have a lower run expectancy, they aren't going to go back to the way things used to be.

  • Author

 

What can the league do, realistically?
If teams have data showing them that those things you suggest have a lower run expectancy, they aren't going to go back to the way things used to be.

I'm not sure.  But there should, theoretically, be a way to do it. 

 

Some ideas I've seen bandied about:

 

-limit the number of pitchers on the 25 man roster. 

 

-increase the minimum size of the bat handle diameter.

 

-lower the mound again.

 

 

Build bigger parks? I think this is sorta cyclical. Right now, hitters are trying to hit home runs but that might change in the future. We might get some hitters to change their two strike approach. Maybe a running team changes how teams are constructed. 

 

But I tend to agree, baseball with strike outs and walks is a bit boring.

 

I'm not sure.  But there should, theoretically, be a way to do it. 

 

Some ideas I've seen bandied about:

 

-limit the number of pitchers on the 25 man roster. 

 

-increase the minimum size of the bat handle diameter.

 

-lower the mound again.

Softer baseball?

 

The feast or famine status of the game has gotten boring.  I personally believe that it's impacted the length of games as well.

 

http://www.espn.com/blog/buster-olney/insider/post/_/id/18486/olney-have-big-swings-big-flies-and-big-whiffs-broken-baseball

 

Count me among those who liked baseball better back in the day when there were more balls in play. More stolen bases, more hit and runs, and yes, even more bunts.

 

I believe MLB needs to do something to start reducing the amount of K's.  

 

I think there are far bigger problems to address then this such as the ridiculous length of MLB games in comparison to AAA games and absolutely atrocious strike zone calling (strike and ball calling should be computer called). 

I think there are far bigger problems to address then this such as the ridiculous length of MLB games in comparison to AAA games and absolutely atrocious strike zone calling (strike and ball calling should be computer called). 

The present shadow of doubt in batters' minds probably has more effect on them, than the uncertainty the pitcher has, as to what will get called a strike. So I assume that automated ball/strike calls will favor the offense. That may cut down on the K's, to Chief's liking, but may also increase walks and homers. Just something to take into account - an increase in run scoring may need to be balanced in some other way. A less-juiced ball would be my solution as well, as it probably results in batters accepting the need to put more balls in play. Optimal launch-angle resulting in mere cans o' corn will concentrate the mind wonderfully. :)

I'm not one to fondly view the past through rose-colored glasses but strikeouts are boring. Walks aren't as boring as strikeouts but they're certainly more boring than hits.

 

Pitching changes are boring. Four hour games that aren't back-and-forth struggles are boring. Station-to-station running is boring.

 

Baseball is a spectator sport and the most boring aspects of the game continue to gain importance. It's not good.

 

http://www.espn.com/blog/buster-olney/insider/post/_/id/18486/olney-have-big-swings-big-flies-and-big-whiffs-broken-baseball

 

Count me among those who liked baseball better back in the day when there were more balls in play. More stolen bases, more hit and runs, and yes, even more bunts.

 

I believe MLB needs to do something to start reducing the amount of K's.  

 

Mark McGwire and Samy Sosa killed smallball for good and there is nothing one may do to resurrect it from the hey it is burning in.  Thankfully.

Edited by Thrylos

I think there are far bigger problems to address then this such as the ridiculous length of MLB games in comparison to AAA games and absolutely atrocious strike zone calling (strike and ball calling should be computer called).

Fewer strikeouts would mean the ball has been put in play sooner in the AB which would mean games would be over sooner.

Fewer strikeouts would mean the ball has been put in play sooner in the AB which would mean games would be over sooner.

A quicker out than a strikeout is one possible outcome. Another is a walk. A ball in play can also fall safely for a hit, in which case you start the count all over again.

 

Strikeouts and pitch counts both being up may be correlation without being causation - in either direction.

My solution:

1. Lower the mound.

2. Enlarge the strike zone.

3. Use softer baseballs.

Fewer walks. Fewer K's (because there wouldn't be as much of a downward plane on pitches). More balls would be put in play but the increase would be mainly in the form of weaker contact.

Edited by Nine of twelve

 

Mark McGwire and Samy Sosa killed smallball for good and there is nothing one may do to resurrect it from the hey it is burning in.  Thankfully.

Regrettably.  I would like balance and diversity.  I agree all small-ball would be boring...but an entire league of players incapable (no matter where in the order they bat, or what the game situation) of hitting the ball the other way, or putting a ball in play, or bunting effectively...also very boring.

Change arbitration rules so HRs for batters and K for pitchers don't influence salary as much. 

 

I'm not saying I support it, but what else can they do at the league level? Otherwise, I'd say this is a coaching issue. 

 

My solution:
1. Lower the mound.
2. Enlarge the strike zone.
3. Use softer baseballs.
Fewer walks. Fewer K's (because there wouldn't be as much of a downward plane on pitches). More balls would be put in play but the increase would be mainly in the form of weaker contact.

 

Yes!!  Especially 2.  Hitters are not being punished enough for waiting for their mashable pitch.  At a certain point, the ability to make contact anywhere in the zone would have to become valuable again.

 

"Strikeouts are boring.  Besides, they're fascist."

 

It's getting to the point where the same is true for home runs.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.