Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: Independent Streak


Recommended Posts

When rebuilding a broken pitching staff, it's necessary to seek out solutions on all fronts. These include free agency, trades, draft, international, and... independent leagues?

 

That last one isn't necessarily a conventional avenue for adding legitimate talent, but the Minnesota Twins have had some success there, and may have more yet to come.For those who enjoy the human element of the game, there's something special about independent ball. Players in these leagues are a long way from the majors, whether undrafted or trying to make their way back into an MLB system. But they're chasing their dreams, often playing in front of paltry crowds for tiny paychecks.

 

When a guy playing in an independent league is able to catch the attention of a major-league organization and work his way to the bigs, it's always a great story. Rich Hill is the most prominent example in the game today. After washing out of affiliated ball in his mid-30s, he signed with the Long Island Ducks in 2015, where he gained notice from the Boston Red Sox. They signed him, he excelled, and two years later he has a $48 million deal with the Dodgers.

 

The Twins haven't had a success of Hill's magnitude, but they've had some notable hits.

 

Minnesota didn't sign Brandon Kintzler out of an independent league, but the former 40th-round draft pick did spend time playing in the Northern League in 2007 and 2008, then with our local St. Paul Saints in 2009, before latching on with the Brewers and finding his way to the big leagues. He would of course later sign with the Twins and turn into an all-star closer, and now he's in line to be pitching in the playoffs in two months.

 

Kintzler's experience in independent ball is now ancient history, but the Twins have a few players who've been there much more recently. Buddy Boshers caught the team's eye while pitching for Somerset in the Atlantic League and is now a fixture in the Minnesota bullpen.

 

Nik Turley was pitching for that same Somerset club last summer, and inked a minor-league deal with the Twins during the offseason, precipitating a major-league debut this year. Things obviously haven't gone smoothly for the southpaw in his three MLB starts, but he continues to dominate at Rochester and will almost surely get more chances. He could become an asset in the bullpen.

 

Tim Melville may be the next name to watch. The Twins signed him in June from the Long Island Ducks team where Hill re-established himself, and he has been tremendous since joining the Class-AAA Red Wings with a 2.55 ERA and 1.07 WHIP through 60 innings. In his latest start for Rochester on Monday, Melville hurled seven innings of one-hit, one-run ball with nine strikeouts.

 

The 27-year-old right-hander is interesting not just because of his recent journey, but because of his history: he's a former fourth-round pick of the Royals who was once ranked among the organization's best young talents and appeared in Baseball Prospectus' Top 100 prospects in 2010. He has flashed good stuff when healthy, with scouts lauding the spin on his breaking balls, and right now it's shining through.

 

If he can keep it up, he may get a look before the year is over. Will he be the next Rich Hill? Not likely. But Melville has a chance to make a real impact, as Boshers has and Turley hopefully still can.

 

At the very least, the former independent leaguer will be another story worth rooting for.

 

Click here to view the article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrote about Melville twice yesterday. Those that watch him say he's been fantastic, good stuff.

 

But the indy thing goes back. Caleb Thielbar. Chris Colabello. Andrew Albers came back to the Twins last year after an indy ball stint and worked back to the big leagues.  It's a great story!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed, great right up.

 

But on a side note that is probably just plain silly (read: yes, completely)...

 

Does anyone else think Buddy Boshers should either grow a BEARD, like Dallas Kuechel style or just shave it off?   This in between stuff is killing me.   Just commit to it brother, go big or go home... LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Independent League players on the big club tells you all you need to know about how awful this club has been.

 

huh?

 

Kintzler has been nothing short of good the last two years. Just because he once played in the Indy leagues doesn't mean he or the Twins are bad. 

 

Turley, imo, has a shot to be a legit bullpen arm. I'd really like to see him tried there this year in MN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

huh?

 

Kintzler has been nothing short of good the last two years. Just because he once played in the Indy leagues doesn't mean he or the Twins are bad. 

 

Turley, imo, has a shot to be a legit bullpen arm. I'd really like to see him tried there this year in MN.

 

Agreed on both of them, and Boshers has been pretty good too most of the time out. 

 

We always say that the Twins and their scouts an analysis should leave no stone unturned. Lots of talent in the independent leagues. A couple could be alright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I too hope Turley gets a look in the pen eventually, but there is no denying he was awful in his 3 starts, and we lost all 3.

 

Melville was similarly awful in 3 appearances in MLB last year.

 

When you're on the edge of a pennant race, these are big risks to take.

 

Are they riskier than bringing up Gonsalves, Romero, Jorge, Slegers?

 

(I don't know the answer to that question, and of course, there's no way to know)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Are they riskier than bringing up Gonsalves, Romero, Jorge, Slegers?

 

(I don't know the answer to that question, and of course, there's no way to know)

Those weren't the only alternatives.  We just traded away Jaime Garcia. We also still have Dillon Gee. Hector Santiago could be activated any day now.  Tyler Duffey could be stretched out too.  I wonder if Colon's former teammate (and AARP buddy :) ) R.A. Dickey cleared waivers?

 

Not world-beaters, but some of those guys should keep you in a game better than Turley demonstrated earlier this summer, or Melville demonstrated in 2016.

 

Personally, I still think they should have looked at Romero instead of Jorge back when they had those spot starts in early July.  He had the best potential, and there were still ways of managing his innings if necessary.  Now we're reaching the point where Jorge and Gonsalves predictably are deemed not ready, and Romero is rapidly becoming less available due to his innings limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 Boshers has been pretty good too most of the time out.

 

I think that there is a disconnect with actually "Good" (which I think as "better than average") and

"better than some of the rest of the Twins' relievers, like Breslow".

 

3.90 ERA, 4.91 FIP,  1.23 WHIP (.266 BABIP) , 12.8 % K-BB%, 79.3% LOB%

 

Bosher's numbers this season.   Not much "good" about them.  Pretty average to below average, and about to regress.  

 

I don't have much problem with this dumpster diving, other than the facts that:

 

a. it really has not been that productive at the major league level

b. Too many of those types of players block younger players (eg. I'd rather see Melotakis rather than Buddy Bo with the Twins, and Romero rather than Melville with Rochester)

c. Yes, some of them have potential (eg. Turley)  that's why they are still playing baseball.  Having potential and realizing at the majors are 2 different things.

Edited by Thrylos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Agreed on both of them, and Boshers has been pretty good too most of the time out.

Boshers has generally been a very low-leverage reliever this season (gmLI of .67), so I'm not sure this means he has been all that useful.  Although he has had a few moments.

 

They seem to be going LOOGY with him now?  4 batters faced total, across 3 appearances, in the month of August so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Boshers has generally been a very low-leverage reliever this season (gmLI of .67), so I'm not sure this means he has been all that useful.  Although he has had a few moments.

 

They seem to be going LOOGY with him now?  4 batters faced total, across 3 appearances, in the month of August so far.

 

Signed out of the indy leagues... contribute in MLB... success... It's really that simple. Makes it a good signing at least.

 

But I'll stand by the fact that they should continue looking to these places for role players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Signed out of the indy leagues... contribute in MLB... success... It's really that simple. Makes it a good signing at least.

But that kinda hinges on one's definition of "contribute". By bWAR, Boshers was a zero last year, and is only at 0.3 this year.  Hopefully that trends up, but right now it's within a rounding error of nothing at all.

 

Not that I disagree with your larger points.  I don't mind signing guys out of indy leagues, and I don't mind giving them chances, although right now, in a pennant race, is a tricky spot for new tryouts.  (One could argue that Boshers has been a bit of a detriment to that end in 2017, as he is a fairly old/known mediocrity taking a roster spot and innings that could have gone toward evaluating Turley or Melville in relief.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Signed out of the indy leagues... contribute in MLB... success... It's really that simple. Makes it a good signing at least.

 

But I'll stand by the fact that they should continue looking to these places for role players. 

 

We're all looking forward to a day when they're not desperately seeking these guys out mid-season to fill up a rotation as an emergency tactic. That takes some of the fun out of these guys' stories.

 

I'm a bit uneasy about all the mid-season add-ons of older indy "prospects" in the low minors. The number of these signings  seems to be much higher than during any season of Ryan's tenure, doesn't it? Are they making up for the Wander Javier year of few IFA signings? Are they replacing last year's crop of late-round choices, or this year's? What's the deal here?

 

I won't hold my breath waiting for a beat writer to ask Brad Steil that question...

Edited by birdwatcher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

But that kinda hinges on one's definition of "contribute". By bWAR, Boshers was a zero last year, and is only at 0.3 this year.  Hopefully that trends up, but right now it's within a rounding error of nothing at all.

 

Not that I disagree with your larger points.  I don't mind signing guys out of indy leagues, and I don't mind giving them chances, although right now, in a pennant race, is a tricky spot for new tryouts.  (One could argue that Boshers has been a bit of a detriment to that end in 2017, as he is a fairly old/known mediocrity taking a roster spot and innings that could have gone toward evaluating Turley or Melville in relief.)

 

 

Let's just hope this is the last year anyone considers it a victory to replace the  -0.3 guy (Tonkin) with the +0.3 guy (Boshers).

Edited by birdwatcher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice write up and I agree you should look everywhere to see what you can find. Just like international FA, you leave no stone unturned.

 

After Turley could have a future in the pen, but control at the ML evaded him early this year. Melville is interesting due to age and previous prospect status. If he hadn't gotten hurt, who knows what he may have become. Late bloomer?

 

There are ML players who don't cut it, get hurt, have awful years, etc, who get a fresh/new start and turn themselves around and become solid contributors to good players. The fact that someone hit independent ball before getting another shot shouldn't be an automatic detractors. Long shot? You bet. But they shouldn't just be dismissed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

But that kinda hinges on one's definition of "contribute". By bWAR, Boshers was a zero last year, and is only at 0.3 this year.  Hopefully that trends up, but right now it's within a rounding error of nothing at all.

 

Not that I disagree with your larger points.  I don't mind signing guys out of indy leagues, and I don't mind giving them chances, although right now, in a pennant race, is a tricky spot for new tryouts.  (One could argue that Boshers has been a bit of a detriment to that end in 2017, as he is a fairly old/known mediocrity taking a roster spot and innings that could have gone toward evaluating Turley or Melville in relief.)

 

When the odds of any minor leaguer getting to the big leagues is incredibly, incredibly low, getting to the big leagues alone is a huge thing... Yes, having a positive WAR would be ideal... Teams don't have 25 players who are above the 'mediocre' line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We're all looking forward to a day when they're not desperately seeking these guys out mid-season to fill up a rotation as an emergency tactic. That takes some of the fun out of these guys' stories.

 

I'm a bit uneasy about all the mid-season add-ons of older indy "prospects" in the low minors. The number of these signings  seems to be much higher than during any season of Ryan's tenure, doesn't it? Are they making up for the Wander Javier year of few IFA signings? Are they replacing last year's crop of late-round choices, or this year's? What's the deal here?

 

I won't hold my breath waiting for a beat writer to ask Brad Steil that question...

 

Not sure I understand the correlation between Wander Javier and signing indy league free agents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the odds of any minor leaguer getting to the big leagues is incredibly, incredibly low, getting to the big leagues alone is a huge thing... Yes, having a positive WAR would be ideal... Teams don't have 25 players who are above the 'mediocre' line.

There is no trick to getting guys to the big leagues. Every team has 25 players on its roster. Nobody plays with 22, or 23, or 24. Every team adds minor leaguers every year. It's basically meaningless.

 

The trick is to add minor leaguers who help win more games than the other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that there is a disconnect with actually "Good" (which I think as "better than average") and

"better than some of the rest of the Twins' relievers, like Breslow".

 

3.90 ERA, 4.91 FIP, 1.23 WHIP (.266 BABIP) , 12.8 % K-BB%, 79.3% LOB%

 

Bosher's numbers this season. Not much "good" about them. Pretty average to below average, and about to regress.

 

I don't have much problem with this dumpster diving, other than the facts that:

 

a. it really has not been that productive at the major league level

b. Too many of those types of players block younger players (eg. I'd rather see Melotakis rather than Buddy Bo with the Twins, and Romero rather than Melville with Rochester)

c. Yes, some of them have potential (eg. Turley) that's why they are still playing baseball. Having potential and realizing at the majors are 2 different things.

Boshers ERA is lower than league average based on a 116 ERA+. His FIP is 4.91. So? Last year his FIP was 2.81 with an actual ERA of 4.5. Kinda tells me that FIP really isn't a stat that predicts anything.

 

There have been a lot of people saying that Boshers is going to regress all year. It's August. Running out of season for him to regress. Maybe he's just being used in ways that puts him position to do well. No one is going to mistake Boshers for Andrew Miller, but that doesn't mean he hasn't been and won't continue to be useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there teams that don't do this? The key is doing a better job of it than the other teams. Just because the Twins have been worse than other teams in developing pitchers doesn't mean all the ways that they have sought and developed talent in the past are a failure. The key is to get better at the parts of it that you've been bad at it.

 

There is Nothing wrong with finding Indy league talent or bringing up the best guy even though he is a former Indy leaguer. The problem here, I think, is that all of us here are skeptical to varying degrees about this years moves because of the past 5 years AND because Falvine have not finished the organizational make over. I think Turley and Melvilles success at AAA says they were the right moves bringing them into the organizatio., I'm just not convinced Boshers (Turley, Melville) should be in the Majors over Reed (Gonsalves, Hurlbut, Romero, Slegers) at this point. I might be wrong and there is no way to know for sure until Reed gets his chance. Until our team completes the turn around we will all maintain at least some skepticism

Edited by goulik
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...