Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: Twins Draft Blayne Enlow, Seven More


Recommended Posts

 

Anyone have a list of best remaining players in the draft?

 

From MLB.com

 

Here are the top 10 players -- including eight prep players -- left from the Top 200 Draft prospects list:

29. Blayne Enlow, RHP, St. Amant (La.) HS
30. Nick Allen, SS, Parker (Calif.) HS
39. Tanner Burns, RHP, Decatur (Ala.) HS
45. Jacob Heatherly, LHP, Cullman (Ala.) HS
48. Evan Skoug, C, TCU
52. Alex Scherff, RHP, Colleyville Heritage (Texas) HS
53. Tristan Beck, RHP, Stanford
54. Garrett Mitchell, OF, Orange Lutheran (Calif.) HS
55. Daniel Cabrera, LHP, Parkview Baptist (La.) HS
56. Jacob Pearson, OF, West Monroe (La.) HS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Only issue I see with the Lewis selection (Without the money involved) is it seems shortstop (of he sticks their like they believe he will) is of little need in the system currently. Can never have to many prospects at any given position. Especially up the middle. But doesn't seem it was necessary to spend the 1-1 pick on the position. Let's hope he turns out to be the Twins version of Derek Jeter and there's nothing to worry about.

If we have two true SS at SS and 2nd thats a plus, if we have 3 true SS at SS 2nd and 3rd thats a plus, heck if we have 4 true SS one with a little extra height over at first that's also a plus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure someone has done the analysis, but it would be interesting to see a chart showing percent chance that any given pick (ie. 3rd pick, 44th pick, 190th pick) accumulates 3 career WAR (or whatever the "right" number is).

 

What I suspect it would tell you is that you'd rather have the 50th-54th picks (all 5 of them) rather than the 5 guys you'd get at your regular slots over the first five rounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Keep in mind how hard it is to evaluate especially beyond the top 10.  If we want the Twins to draft the top player on these lists then we should demand the Twins fire Falvey and hire the list maker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm sure someone has done the analysis, but it would be interesting to see a chart showing percent chance that any given pick (ie. 3rd pick, 44th pick, 190th pick) accumulates 3 career WAR (or whatever the "right" number is).

 

What I suspect it would tell you is that you'd rather have the 50th-54th picks (all 5 of them) rather than the 5 guys you'd get at your regular slots over the first five rounds.

 

The problem with this is it doesn't account for signability.  After the first few picks, it may not be selecting the best player so much as selecting the best player that fits into your draft strategy / budget. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thoughts... 3rd round, I'd probably want Jacob Weatherly, and then take a catcher in the 4th round.

 

 

There was a bit of a catcher run at the end of Day 1, so it's possible that they could go with whoever they think is the top catcher with 76  and then hope for a high-end HS pitcher at 106.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twins Daily Contributor

 

My thoughts... 3rd round, I'd probably want Jacob Weatherly, and then take a catcher in the 4th round.

 

 

There was a bit of a catcher run at the end of Day 1, so it's possible that they could go with whoever they think is the top catcher with 76  and then hope for a high-end HS pitcher at 106.

 

Do we have good information that Enlow is unsignable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Anyone know the odds of a 3rd round or later guy beoming a productive player?

Here is a great in depth piece on the Draft using data from 1998-2012 , what values to expect based on WAR, how well teams draft, etc.  The average 1:1 in that period was 18.5 WAR for their career (up to this point).  There is a significant drop between early rounds (1st-80th pick overall and middle rounds (80th-100th overall).  BTW Adam Johnson is one of the worst picks in the time period

 

 

http://www.thebaseball.blog/who-drafts-the-best/

With a good podcast interview on Effectively Wild

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The problem with this is it doesn't account for signability.  After the first few picks, it may not be selecting the best player so much as selecting the best player that fits into your draft strategy / budget. 

 

It's hard to play the under slot game without a top 3 pick so i think the #'s would basically give you an accurate indication.  Chances are the #76 pick or whatever we're on has never been used under slot, Twins are in position to increase the odds to probably mid to late 2nd round level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure someone has done the analysis, but it would be interesting to see a chart showing percent chance that any given pick (ie. 3rd pick, 44th pick, 190th pick) accumulates 3 career WAR (or whatever the "right" number is).

 

What I suspect it would tell you is that you'd rather have the 50th-54th picks (all 5 of them) rather than the 5 guys you'd get at your regular slots over the first five rounds.

I posted a link to that yesterday. Check fangraphs, or I will post again. It gets random faster than people think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some site predicts the Twins will take HS OF Tristan Lulz with the first pick of the 3rd round... 

 

 

https://twitter.com/jwgravley/status/874624679046262784

 

Draft Site (that's the name of the site) is a joke, they post a random mock for each sport that goes super deep and they never really update it, even when it says it is. They probably had us going with Faedo before the draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twins Daily Contributor

 

Well the Twins have had 12 hours to find out. Probably easier to get a read when the click isn't ticking.

I think I prefer Weatherly but the Twins might have saved enough cash to get both.

 

Who is this "Weatherly" guy everyone keeps mentioning?!  ;-)

 

(Heatherly I'd be fine with too if he's the one they think they can sign, but it would be awesome if your second sentence came true!)

Edited by Steve Lein
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Anyone know the odds of a 3rd round or later guy beoming a productive player?

Over the span of 1998-2012 Draft, picks from 80-300 are valued at an average of .5 WAR for their career.  Later than that .2 WAR career.  

 

The expected WAR for career draft picks based on article data of 1998-2012

 

1:1 is 12.9,

1:2 is 11.0,

1:3 is 9.9

1:4 is 9.1

1:5 is 8.5

1:6 is 8.0

1:7 is 7.5,

1:8 is 7.2

1:9 is 6.9

1:15 is 5.5,

1:25 is 4.1

80th is .9

105th is .8

210th is .6

402th is .2

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Over the span of 1998-2012 Draft, picks from 80-300 are valued at an average of .5 WAR for their career.  Later than that .2 WAR career.  

 

The expected WAR for career draft picks based on article data of 1998-2012

 

1:1 is 12.9,

1:2 is 11.0,

1:3 is 9.9

1:4 is 9.1

1:5 is 8.5

1:6 is 8.0

1:7 is 7.5,

1:8 is 7.2

1:9 is 6.9

1:15 is 5.5,

1:25 is 4.1

80th is .9

105th is .8

210th is .6

402th is .2

 

I'd be curios to know the break down between pitcher and position player.  I'm guessing position players have a meaningful advantage although it might come down to HOF level players skewing position players more then pitchers along with shorter careers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MaineBall
12:48 Who has the highest ceiling of the remaining players?

 

Eric A Longenhagen
12:49 If either Riley Adams or KJ Harrison can catch and tap into their power, they're beasts. Both have huge question marks about those particular skills, which is why they're still on the board.

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/eric-longenhagen-prospects-chat-mlb-draft-day-2/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...