Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: Twins Select Brent Rooker, Landon Leach On Day 1


Recommended Posts

The Twins made a somewhat surprising choice at 1-1 by selecting SS/CF Royce Lewis, who is represented by Scott Boras. The rumor was that it was a money-saving pick. And Mike Radcliff said the Twins had big plans at 35 and 37.

 

So we spent the next nearly three hours watching the names that might be tumbling down the draft boards.Does either outfielder Brent Rooker or RHP Landon Leach equate to a "big plan?" Only time will tell. Here is a very brief description of each.

 

Comp Round A; 35th overall - Brent Rooker, OF, Mississippi State

 

Rooker put up video game numbers after re-entering the draft after not signing with the Twins last year. I'd expect Rooker to make his way to Cedar Rapids this year and could move relatively quickly. Not a pick that should command much of extra bonus money. Rooker reminds me a bit of a right-handed version of Daniel Palka.

 

2nd round; 37th overall - Landon Leach, RHP, Ontario (Canada) prep

 

A big-bodied (6' 4", 220 lb) prep, Leach is projectable and currently features a three-pitch mix which includes a low-90s fastball, a curveball and a changeup, Leach has had success while competing on a Canadian national team. Leach is committed to Texas.

 

Minnesota prep pitcher Sam Carlson has likely priced himself out of getting drafted in the Top 10 rounds. It appears likely that he'll head to Florida. (EDIT: Interestingly, Carlson was drafted by the Mariners 55th overall. This is a puzzling one... if he's signable here, what gives...?)

 

Greg Deichmann, who was drafted by the Twins last year but instead returned to LSU, was taken in the second round.

 

The Twins will be first on the clock tomorrow afternoon when the 3rd round starts with the 76th overall pick.

 

So what do you think after three picks?

 

Click here to view the article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually read about the Canadian pitcher earlier today.  Baseball Canada "hoped" he would be picked early on the second DAY, not early in the second ROUND.

 

So, the "big plans" for 35 and 37 were to save even more money.

 

Do we win a prize for saving the most $$$ from the signing bonus pool?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

 

I actually read about the Canadian pitcher earlier today.  Baseball Canada "hoped" he would be picked early on the second DAY, not early in the second ROUND.

 

So, the "big plans" for 35 and 37 were to save even more money.

 

Do we win a prize for saving the most $$$ from the signing bonus pool?

We saved money by drafting, allegedly, under slot with the top pick to save money on drafting a guy we've already drafted, and a Canadian who wasn't expected to go any time soon. 

The front office can't get a bonus for pool money not spent, can they? 

"BOOM!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't imagine that either of these guys are going to come in over slot, so they still have money to spend. I don't know who those guys might be... but there are still going to be guys that tumble.

 

But yeah, not super exciting... at least not the excitement I was hoping for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is odd. Maybe Lewis didn't give a discount. Maybe they just thought he was the best player in the draft.

If Lewis didn't sign under slot then that must be the case. I'm OK with it, I want them to draft whomever they believe is the best player. 

 

If that isn't the rationale and Lewis indeed signed under slot then odd might be too gentle of a descriptor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I actually read about the Canadian pitcher earlier today.  Baseball Canada "hoped" he would be picked early on the second DAY, not early in the second ROUND.

 

So, the "big plans" for 35 and 37 were to save even more money.

 

Do we win a prize for saving the most $$$ from the signing bonus pool?

You keep your job!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We saved money by drafting, allegedly, under slot with the top pick to save money on drafting a guy we've already drafted, and a Canadian who wasn't expected to go any time soon. 

The front office can't get a bonus for pool money not spent, can they? 

"BOOM!"

Maybe the "bonus" is that they get to keep their jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is a pretty decent chance based on these picks that the FO dynamic duo completely outsmarted themselves….the people they were ‘saving slot money for’ were gone for these picks…..this one draft day could end up having huge impact on their half-life in their current positions. (yep, I’m going there)  I believe that they are talented, but I also believe that they are prone to thinking they are the smartest people in every room which leave them susceptible to exactly what played out today…… Man do I hope I’m dead wrong….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

I always assumed it wasn't Terry Ryan that was super cheap, rather he had a tight budget dictated by the Pohlad's. Terry is gone. Same old.

 

I just hope Falvey and Lavine were made aware of this issue before signing on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

Call me disappointed, a Canadian pitcher and a 20-something OF? Don't we have enough 20-something OF already?

 

I was one of the last stalwarts still supporting the old regime, I guess we wait a long time to see if Falvine is right.

 

By the way, how many young SS are in the system now? Didn't we spend a ton on Wander Javier?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

29 Nick Allen SS  Francis Parker School, San Diego Calif. 7

33 Blayne Enlow RHP  St. Amant (La.) HS La. 1

38 Tanner Burns RHP  Decatur (Ala.) HS Ala. 2

39 Brady McConnell SS  Merritt Island (Fla.) HS Fla. 4

41 Tristan Beck RHP  Stanford Calif. 9
 

and Jacob Heatherly, a HS LHP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...