Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: Ervin Santana Is Legit


Recommended Posts

Maybe it's the team's history with free agents. Perhaps it is the perpetual up-and-down pattern of his career. Or maybe it's just a well justified skepticism about the sustainability of any good starting pitcher wearing a Minnesota Twins uniform.

 

Whatever the reasons, people have had a hard time buying into Ervin Santana as a legitimate front-line starter. But at this point, it's an inescapable conclusion.Throughout his entire career, Santana has been a very streaky pitcher, so in a sense we should not go crazy over his incredible start to the 2017 season. But then again, this is the form he showed for most of 2016. The veteran right-hander is (hopefully) heading into a fifth straight season of sustained health and quality production.

 

The improved results over this extensive stretch owe to more than just another hot streak. Since adding a new pitch to his repertoire, Santana has been a different player. A much better one, who shows signs of entrenching himself as a true No. 1 starter on a staff that desperately needs one to stick.

 

In 2012, Santana allowed a league-leading 39 home runs in just 178 innings while scuffling through his final year with the Angels, in which he posted a career-worst ERA+ of 74. Perhaps it was this that inspired him to add a two-seam fastball – more colloquially known as a sinker – to his mix the following year.

 

As you can see in the image below via Brooks Baseball, a new gray datapoint line starts appearing in 2013. This is when he started using the sinker, or at least in a way that caused it to register as such. The offering has been a noticeable difference-maker for him.

 

Download attachment: Brooksbaseball-Chart.jpeg

 

Santana has always been pretty good at limiting base-runners, evidenced by a 1.28 career WHIP. But in his down years, home runs have haunted, punishing him for the occasional walk or base hit. He's now in Year 5 since altering his arsenal, and there's been a distinct change.

 

Through 2012, Santana had allowed homers at a 3.2 percent rate, with a 4.33 ERA. Since then, 2.5 percent with a 3.39 ERA. It's only a piece of the puzzle, but the bottom line is that Santana has been a really good pitcher for quite a while now. He has basically neutralized his one weakness – the long ball – and after making that adjustment hasn't really had a bad season.

 

Since 2013, only 18 pitchers have thrown more innings with a better ERA, and they're all really damn good (surrounding Santana on the list are Jordan Zimmermann and Dallas Keuchel).

 

Now, this isn't to say that Erv is ace material, or the guy you ideally want in Game 1 of a postseason series. He's just an extremely reliable above-average starter – a commodity that's been in short supply around these parts. And at the price the Twins are paying ($13.5 million this year and next, with a $14 million option in 2019) he's a real bargain.

 

Naturally, this raises questions about how things might shape up at the trade deadline. Should the rest of the league become convinced of his value (and if he keeps pitching well for three more months, why would they doubt it?), Santana could bring back a decent haul. That's another asset for Derek Falvey and Thad Levine – already gifted the No. 1 overall draft pick and highest waiver priority – to keep in their pockets. Certainly a favorable inheritance for a new front office focused on building from the ground up.

 

Of course, right now, selling is not the mindset. The Twins are 7-5, and in second place. While the thrill of actually being relevant may be fleeting, it may not. Either way, we'll all ride it as long as we can, especially with Santana keeping the good times rolling each fifth day.

 

Click here to view the article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mark me down as cautiously optimistic. I have much more confidence that Ervin will have a good year  than this team will. Although, that isn't exactly high praise. Hopefully he keeps it up until the deadline and the Twins pull the trigger. If I'm buying his 2017 start as a continuation of last season's success and not a streak then I'm going to need to see some games against teams that aren't KC or the Chi Sox, but so far so good.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Twins (finally) get a reliable starter, and at a good price, and the trade flag is waived?  That will send a message to everyone--but not a welcome message!  I actually think that the Twins pick up his option year. In fact after his option year is used, Santana might be offered another year if all goes well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The Twins (finally) get a reliable starter, and at a good price, and the trade flag is waived?  That will send a message to everyone--but not a welcome message!  I actually think that the Twins pick up his option year. In fact after his option year is used, Santana might be offered another year if all goes well.

Just keep in mind that at that point he will be 36 years old. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During today's broadcast, a stat was shown that Santana leads the league in ERA since, I believe, July 6th of last season. That and his overall performance last season and his start this season is very interesting to me.

 

It tells me, #1, the Twins were smart to hold on to him. #2, it tells me the rest of the league, particularly those teams who could make a serious run but might need another SP, are either not paying attention, OR, were lowballing the Twins with offers. (Sound familiar?)

 

It also, IMO, despite being a bit of a stretch, indicates something I've argued about for some time now in regard to prospects and roster construction in general. You just never know who will become a top, front line SO, despite "expert" evaluation.

 

Again, I'm stretching the Santana argument a bit, but not that much really. I've seen countless, sure-fire future ACE pitchers flame out, as well as "solid" guys turn out to become front line #1 guys. And I suppose we could spend hours of posts and threads discussing such, but my point is, I always find it blindly interesting how the Twins seemingly have NO top of the rotation arms in their system, when we just simply don't know what the next 1-3 years will produce.

 

And I realize we are talking about a solid, established, veteran pitcher vs prospects, but the comparison remains valid. Just look at the Cubs and Indians for examples. You draft, you sign, and you try to put the best coaches and instructors in place, but you still can't always predict where or when the next great pitcher will emerge in your system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, when did we stop calling a sinker a sinker?  James Shields has been well known for his sinker.  Not one single time did Dick or Bert say sinker.  

 

ARGH!  The namby pamby world we live in    ;-) 

 

ahem, that being said......

 

Right now, Ervin is good for this pitching staff:  a calm, steady and successful veteran in a sea of veteran misfits and young hopefuls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The argument over ACE is getting tiring.  He is our Ace and it is good to have him there.  He has done all we could ask of an ACE, but trade him?  Yes.  Take a look at this 2012 article on pitcher regression:  http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/pitcher-aging-curves-starters-and-relievers/  Age does matter and it matters where he has a half year off for drug rest or not.  Age just happens and the body breaks down.  Move him at his peak and we will be better off.  Only a few freaks like Nolan Ryan and Warren Spahn keep pitching well into their 40's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2012, Santana allowed a league-leading 39 home runs in just 178 innings while scuffling through his final year with the Angels, in which he posted a career-worst ERA+ of 74. Perhaps it was this that inspired him to add a two-seam fastball – more colloquially known as a sinker – to his mix the following year.

 

 

I'm not sure if it is a glitch in the Pitch F/X calculation or not (it's been known to happen) but Santana was supposedly throwing a two-seamer dating back to 2010 (http://www.espn.com/los-angeles/mlb/news/story?id=5007541). Sometimes these pitches aren't captured by the pitch recognition formulas. Then again, maybe he never threw it much during game action or didn't have the same type of movement he does now. 

 

Overall, Fangraphs charts Santana as throwing fewer than 30 two-seamers each season over the last two years, which is surprising. 

 

Another note for his rebound includes improving his mechanics and changing his changeup grip from a split-change to a four-fingered grip: http://twinsdaily.com/_/minnesota-twins-news/what-to-expect-from-ervin-santana-r3252

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's surprising is that this is surprising. Most pitchers who had no hitters are "legit." Most pitchers who stick around as long as Santana has are "legit." Most pitchers who juice are "legit."

 

To me, this proves that a lot of Twins fans get stuck looking at stats that are less relevant. When I looked at Santana I always saw a rising star, provided he remained healthy. 

 

So while many of you looked at FIP and claimed Nolasco was a great pick up, I looked at other things and predicted Santana was a great pick up (and called Nolasco a stupid move from the get-go).

 

Ya'll gotta look deeper at these things.

Edited by Doomtints
Link to comment
Share on other sites

they should 100% be trading him at the deadline unless they are in a playoff team at the time, even then, I'd consider it. This team is not a playoff team. 

 

As the Yankees showed us last year, and as TX has stated in interviews, and as the Cubs and Astros showed us, you have to be willing to trade veterans to build for the future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I take it you remembered Juan Rincon and changed your mind on this one?

 

Rincon was legit for a while.  So was Romero.  The two of them were key assets on some very successful Twins teams.

 

I crossed it out for a different reason, because it's not proper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

they should 100% be trading him at the deadline unless they are in a playoff team at the time, even then, I'd consider it. This team is not a playoff team. 

 

As the Yankees showed us last year, and as TX has stated in interviews, and as the Cubs and Astros showed us, you have to be willing to trade veterans to build for the future. 

 

Yep.  I love Santana but if his stock remains high it's time for the trade.  With only 1 year left on his deal there will be suitors this time, the risk of him falling off a cliff and being stuck with him is lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

they should 100% be trading him at the deadline unless they are in a playoff team at the time, even then, I'd consider it. This team is not a playoff team. 

 

As the Yankees showed us last year, and as TX has stated in interviews, and as the Cubs and Astros showed us, you have to be willing to trade veterans to build for the future. 

 

If continues pitching like this up to the trade deadline and some team comes knocking with a nice package of prospects i just don't see how you turn them down.  Unless these guys surprise everyone and are legitimately in the playoff hunt.  Then it gets tough.  But i agree.  Add talent while you still have a chance (he's going to be 35 next season).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

Understanding that this won't continue for Santana, but perhaps thinking he is a little bit better than last year, I'm curious what people think they'd receive for Santana.

 

I understand the desire to trade him if you don't think this is a playoff team (I would agree), but I think the return will be a little bit disappointing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Understanding that this won't continue for Santana, but perhaps thinking he is a little bit better than last year, I'm curious what people think they'd receive for Santana.

 

I understand the desire to trade him if you don't think this is a playoff team (I would agree), but I think the return will be a little bit disappointing.

 

Hmm... I'd probably look for a top 100 SP prospect, and another very young positional prospect or 2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So, when did we stop calling a sinker a sinker?  James Shields has been well known for his sinker.  Not one single time did Dick or Bert say sinker.  

 

ARGH!  The namby pamby world we live in    ;-) 

It might be that Shields has lost so much off his "fastball" that it now has arc rather than sink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Understanding that this won't continue for Santana, but perhaps thinking he is a little bit better than last year, I'm curious what people think they'd receive for Santana.

 

I understand the desire to trade him if you don't think this is a playoff team (I would agree), but I think the return will be a little bit disappointing.

 

I think we should approach the Dodgers about a trade for De Leon, Alvarez and one other guy.  

 

OH that's right they don't need pitching and DeLeon was traded already.  All kidding aside I'm 99% positive that their will be a much bigger market for starting pitching when the playoffs near and teams realize they need a top of the rotation starter (assuming Santana continues like this).  We won't get forced into a corner by teams like the Dodgers because there's a narrow demand for second baseman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

 

I think we should approach the Dodgers about a trade for De Leon, Alvarez and one other guy.  

 

OH that's right they don't need pitching and DeLeon was traded already.  All kidding aside I'm 99% positive that their will be a much bigger market for starting pitching when the playoffs near and teams realize they need a top of the rotation starter (assuming Santana continues like this).  We won't get forced into a corner by teams like the Dodgers because there's a narrow demand for second baseman.

 

There will certainly be a market, they won't have trouble trading him. I'm just not as confident it will be an package that will be all that impressive.

 

If the Twins are trending upwards, if not exactly playoff bound this year, might just make sense to keep him for the rest of his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

There will certainly be a market, they won't have trouble trading him. I'm just not as confident it will be an package that will be all that impressive.

 

If the Twins are trending upwards, if not exactly playoff bound this year, might just make sense to keep him for the rest of his contract.

 

It may make sense to dangle him out before Jose Quintana and Yu Darvish are put on the trade block this season. That way they can set the market for how much a SP should get in return. Once the White Sox set the market for Eaton and Sale in the winter, the hot stove started to cool down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...