Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

2016-2017 Vikings Offseason Thread


TheLeviathan

Recommended Posts

 

Liz Habib @LizHabib 5h5 hours ago
The @Chargers told me this is NOT their new logo- you won't see it on helmets or uniforms... it was for marketing purposes today.

That was a quick back pedal... Here's our logo. *crowd hates it* Just kidding! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 255
  • Created
  • Last Reply

 

Liz Habib @LizHabib 5h5 hours ago
The @Chargers told me this is NOT their new logo- you won't see it on helmets or uniforms... it was for marketing purposes today.

 

Yeah for marketing purposes, as in, "Hey, who here likes the Dodgers?! Well you're going to love us because we're basically the football Dodgers! Do you guys like us now? Wait, do you want us to actually change our name to the Football Dodgers? I think that name kind of sounds like we're the kid in school who is too afraid to catch the ball, but if you guys super promise to support us and not the Rams, we'll do it!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they are, they are just playing in two different stadiums until the Rams stadium is built. The Chargers will be renting from the Rams is my understanding.

 

Maybe scheduling at Memorial Stadium doesn't quite work for two NFL teams in addition to the Trojans currently. Or maybe USC said they'd prefer not to have two NFL teams tearing up their field as the turf would never get a week off to rejuvenate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think they are, they are just playing in two different stadiums until the Rams stadium is built. The Chargers will be renting from the Rams is my understanding.

 

Maybe scheduling at Memorial Stadium doesn't quite work for two NFL teams in addition to the Trojans currently. Or maybe USC said they'd prefer not to have two NFL teams tearing up their field as the turf would never get a week off to rejuvenate.

 

Ah, thanks, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't get it.  It's not like LA embraced the Rams returning.

As a long-time resident of both SD and LA, I know the thinking behind this move:

 

The Spanos family are giant, raging, burning ******* ****face pieces of ****.

 

It's as simple as that. They're one of the worst owners in sports and have been waging a hot/cold war with San Diego since I moved there in 1992.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Heck, maybe even San Diego decides to do it in five years or so.

Unlikely, as pretty much every Chargers fan I know wants to Mussolini-in-a-public-square the entire Spanos family right now.

 

And they've wanted to do this for a few decades now.

 

It's interesting how SoCal had, for so long, two of the worst owners in sports: the Spanos and Sterling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Unlikely, as pretty much every Chargers fan I know wants to Mussolini-in-a-public-square the entire Spanos family right now.

 

And they've wanted to do this for a few decades now.

 

It's interesting how SoCal had, for so long, two of the worst owners in sports: the Spanos and Sterling.

 

Sterling doesn't own the Clippers anymore which suggests the Spanos family doesn't have to own the Chargers forever either. Anything can happen, I'm just guessing that in the not too distant future the Spanos family may find that renting from the Rams in a luke warm LA market isn't nearly as profitable as they hoped.

 

And if they are sold, it probably wouldn't be surprising if someone pops up who wants to be viewed as a white knight with grand plans to bring the Chargers back home. Goodwill from one of the countries largest metropolitan areas is probably worth quite a fortune itself. I'd guess that if the time comes, Kronke will be more than amenable to "helping" them leave LA and reclaiming the market all for himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, but that was the thought when the Oilers left Houston and the Browns left Cleveland. I don't recall if there was any kind of political hustle for new stadiums when the Colts left Baltimore or when the Cardinals left St. Louis, but in all four cases either local grass roots efforts were made to get a team again or another business person quickly realized the financial benefits of filling the void and the NFL was more than happy to join the push to put a team where an existing fanbase was accustomed to and was ready to embrace a team.

 

Baltimore was the only city to have to wait more than a decade but even their wait was only 12 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The people of San Diego make me believe in humanity again. No more communities need to pay a significant portion of a new stadium. 

 

True, and that makes me happy.

 

Of course hypocritically I'd be full of piss and vinegar had it been Minnesota who told the Vikings to get lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

True, and that makes me happy.

 

Of course hypocritically I'd be full of piss and vinegar had it been Minnesota who told the Vikings to get lost.

Luckily the Vikings came up with the incredibly successful e-pull tab idea to pay off most of the bill!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Luckily the Vikings came up with the incredibly successful e-pull tab idea to pay off most of the bill!

 

Hey now, don't sell them short, it was superduperincredibly successful.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a good start to the off-season. Matt Kalil's agent was on Paul Allen's show this morning and said:

"I think it's going to be difficult for [the Vikings] to re-sign Kalil," Baratz told KFAN. "I don't think he'll end up here."

 

Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't play the link, it's probably blocked by my work computer. Were there any other details? Because Kalil never looked like he enjoyed playing here. I could see him turning down the Vikings just to get away.

 

Which might be best for the long run. While he may be the best LT on the market, he's still not a very good LT and re-signing him would basically be committing to him for several more years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't play the link, it's probably blocked by my work computer. Were there any other details? Because Kalil never looked like he enjoyed playing here. I could see him turning down the Vikings just to get away.

 

Which might be best for the long run. While he may be the best LT on the market, he's still not a very good LT and re-signing him would basically be committing to him for several more years.

That quote was essentially it. The rest was filler about him being injured the last 2 years but still a top T FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, might not be a bad idea to target another young QB in the draft.

No doubt. Then again I'm always on board to draft a QB in the middle rounds every year until a franchise QB is found. Not a big fan of selecting a QB and handing him the keys for 3 years until they sink or swim. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time to extend Sammy....they won't find a better QB, unless they tank and lose a lot.....

I disagree. Franchise QB's can be found all over the draft.

If you list all the legit franchise QB's in the NFL, how many were taken in the first half of the first round?

 

Look at the franchise QB's in the playoffs this year-

Brady

Roethlisberger

Rodgers

Ryan

Prescott

Wilson

 

I think only 1 (Ryan) of those guys was picked in the top half of the first round.

 

I'm not a fan of locking up Bradford.

I think he's just good enough to keep you competitive, but not good enough to win Super Bowls.

The salary of a franchise QB limits keeping a core around him.

That means you have to either find one that you believe can be a perennial SB threat, or cycle through guys on rookie deals and be able to afford a good core around them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Bad news. Looks like Teddy is going to be out for all of 2017 as well recovering from his gruesome knee injury. 

I am not surprised. I feel bad for the kid. He seems like a solid person with a good head on his shoulders.

 

I know there is a lot of skepticism on whether Teddy could be an above average QB. I believed he was going to turn out to be pretty good and I thought he was going to take that big step forward in the 2016 season (note: I thought that before the season started and OL went to Shiznit).

 

Now he has mountains to climb that seem insurmountable. I wish him the best and good fortune!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

I disagree. Franchise QB's can be found all over the draft.

If you list all the legit franchise QB's in the NFL, how many were taken in the first half of the first round?

 

Look at the franchise QB's in the playoffs this year-

Brady

Roethlisberger

Rodgers

Ryan

Prescott

Wilson

 

I think only 1 (Ryan) of those guys was picked in the top half of the first round.

 

I'm not a fan of locking up Bradford.

I think he's just good enough to keep you competitive, but not good enough to win Super Bowls.

The salary of a franchise QB limits keeping a core around him.

That means you have to either find one that you believe can be a perennial SB threat, or cycle through guys on rookie deals and be able to afford a good core around them.

Roethlisberger went 11 and the other QB from the round (I'm not counting Houston) went #1 overall.

 

Seems that half outside first round is a fluke more than a plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...