Earlier today, I wrote an article on the six players that the Twins have to decide whether or not to tender an offer to by Wednesday night at 11 p.m. Now I'll ask you, if you're the GM of the Twins, would you offer arbitration to? Note, you can vote for all six if you would vote for each of them.

Pretty sure your % are wrong.

 

Pretty sure your % are wrong.

 

That's not % of voters who would offer arbitration to a particular player, it is total % of the vote (adds to 100) - looks like a system bug

Edited December 2, 201510 yr by Thrylos

Yeah, good catch. That's definitely not right. Maybe ther'es a way to do it correctly.

I think Plouffe, Escobar, Jepsen, and Milone are guarantees. I know some people may not want to tender Milone, but there's no reason to just let him go. The Twins can trade him - maybe not for much, but that'd be better than letting him walk. If they don't trade him, he's an OK starter and some nice depth. 

 

Nunez and Fien are definitely debatable. I'm not sure if Nunez is needed with Santana likely taking up a bench spot.

 

Yeah, good catch. That's definitely not right. Maybe ther'es a way to do it correctly.

Or we can just settle for mediocrity, which was discussed in an earlier thread....KIDDING!!!!

 

I think Plouffe, Escobar, Jepsen, and Milone are guarantees. I know some people may not want to tender Milone, but there's no reason to just let him go. The Twins can trade him - maybe not for much, but that'd be better than letting him walk. If they don't trade him, he's an OK starter and some nice depth. 

 

Nunez and Fien are definitely debatable. I'm not sure if Nunez is needed with Santana likely taking up a bench spot.

Nunez absolutely has no real reason to be here if Santana is on the team, Santana is a better option with upside when it comes to super Util, also he can handle CF and SS which Nunez could not.