Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: Twins Will Be Active Shoppers At Trade Deadline


Recommended Posts

 

Pretty much this.  Definitely not hindsight, that trade was slammed from the beginning by everyone I know.

 

And, BTW, prior to getting Capps, we lost one game after Rauch was brought in to close the game. One.  Where was the urgency?  

 

Getting a mediocre closer for a playoff run is not 'going for it'

I believe the Capps trade was made to quiet Gardenhire ("I can't manage without a closer...").  Non sequitar--"nor with one".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If Buxton is hurt again, thems the breaks.

 

Notice one thing about my post: I didn't point out two of the three biggest issues on the 2015 Twins - shortstop and catcher.

 

This team has three major glaring flaws - bullpen, catcher, shortstop. It has question marks in centerfield, the rotation (as far as the playoffs are concerned), and I'm putting the bullpen here again because it's that bad. Where the team is set with a player, they offer middling production from most of the field: first base, left field, center field, right field, DH.

 

This isn't a team poised to get hot and thrive in a playoff environment. It's a team poised to scuffle along and barely miss or make the playoffs. If Ryan were to somehow transform this team into a solid contender, he'd have to trade half the farm and swing 4-5 deals just to get the Twins to the level of the Angels or Royals.

 

This isn't the 2010 Twins that were an incredibly solid team from front to back. It's not a surprising but sustainable team like the 2002 team. Hell, it's not even the rounded but flawed 2006 squad.

 

The 2015 Twins are closer to the 2001 Twins than any other team in recent memory and that's not a team you bank on down the stretch. You shore up minor issues without giving up much, hope a few things break right, and don't get too upset if they don't.

 

And I thought I was rough on this team......

 

I don't see how you think they can possibly compete next year either, frankly, since there are no catchers or SS available in FA, and they aren't signing an ACE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they are going to make a few trades for a bullpen arm or two.  I don't think they'll be big names and I don't think it'll cost a lot. That's pretty much all I see happening.  I would love to see them trade for a catcher, but I don't think they will be willing to give up enough for a guy like Lucroy.  

 

My guess is we'll see an AJ reunion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I thought I was rough on this team......

 

I don't see how you think they can possibly compete next year either, frankly, since there are no catchers or SS available in FA, and they aren't signing an ACE.

They need a catcher. They need a shortstop. They need a bullpen.

 

Catcher needs to be found externally. It will be a massive failure of that isn't fixed by February.

 

Shortstop probably needs to be found externally. That's why I'm not 100% against Tulo.

 

The bullpen should have had open auditions two months ago. I think that has a chance to be fixed internally and by picking up a decent vet.

 

The rotation... Well, cross your fingers on Meyer and Berrios. I don't see how else it will get fixed. Having a full season of Santana should help somewhat. He's not amazing but as a third starter, he should be okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

whatever reason, it was an easy call to say that it was a horrible and needless trade.

 

The Span trade is starting to look more and more like a bad deal.  Interesting how the Nats have managed to burn the Twins twice now.  Think they knew something our front office didn't about Alex Meyer, specifically related to self confidence & control issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The Span trade is starting to look more and more like a bad deal.  Interesting how the Nats have managed to burn the Twins twice now.  Think they knew something our front office didn't about Alex Meyer, specifically related to self confidence & control issues. 

IMO, the reasoning behind the Span trade was sound.  The execution was bad.

Edited by jimmer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, it's clear that the Twins are in a "win now" attitude:  1)  The purpose of signing Hunter  2)keeping Escobar in the line-up someplace 3) the promotion of Buxton and Sano this season rather than delaying until next season which would have extended "team control" 4) keeping Arcia (and others) in the minors rather than "one last chance" him before placing others ahead of him (them) on the "List".  All of these point to "Win Now"--therefore continue with that theme and acquire some real veteran talent and "roll with them".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I agree, This team isn't one player away from real contention, it's 3-4 players away and that's assuming Sano, Rosario and Hicks all continue to perform at their present level or better. Now is not the time to make a multi-player prospect offer to get a TT or similar player.  The original plan shouldn't change - keep feeding younger players into the roster (Buxton and Berrios this year plus those already here and Arcia) and let them get a taste of meaningful games. I'm usually all in favor of making a trade to get the short term player who might take you over the top because opportunities don't come along very often. hat works if you're 1-2 players away and above average to strong everywhere else. That is not this team. 

I don't think they need 3-4 players to make the playoffs but obviously they're not going to blow up their farm system even if there are 3-4 available guys out there that they want anyway.  Trading a couple prospects to give yourself a chance in the now is not necessarily going to derail the future. They've got a lot of young talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I guess my thinking isn't that they need 3-4 players to make the playoffs as a wild card, but they need 3-4 players to be a real contender if they get into the playoffs. They just don't have the horses yet. I have nothing against trading away a couple of prospects but I don't think they will get much for the ones they are willing to trade; at least not enough to meaningfully impact this year.

The only names I've heard so far that I'd be good w/ them trading top prospects for are Tulo and Lucroy but sounds like the Brewers want a bevy of prospects for Lucroy and the Tulo deal doesn't sound real likely either so you're probably right about your last bit. And a WS is unlikely but the first step is making the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Mostly disagree....they have banked these wins. Casting them aside, on the hope that next year will be better......that's how you pretty much never win. Because next year you do the same thing....and then next year again. At some point, you try to win.

 

If they are supposed to stand still this year, what's different next year that makes you think they'll be looking at this many wins at the ASB?

They will have E Santana and Sano for the first half that didn't this year.  Buxton will also probably be there for the first half.  It be Hughes alternating "good" year. ( just kidding on that one).  Players like Schafer and Robinson will have been replaced by players like Rosario and Hicks.  Berrios has a good chance to make the rotation.  Lots of reasons to think the team will be better next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

They will have E Santana and Sano for the first half that didn't this year.  Buxton will also probably be there for the first half.  It be Hughes alternating "good" year. ( just kidding on that one).  Players like Schafer and Robinson will have been replaced by players like Rosario and Hicks.  Berrios has a good chance to make the rotation.  Lots of reasons to think the team will be better next year.

 

so they'll be more than 9 games over .500 at the ASB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Experiment - bring up the young players and rotate them through the rest of the season, see if someone develops the hot hand that Santana had last year - Polanco? 

 

The catchers are either going to cost too much of the future or be a step back (A J ) and we do not need another old Twin reunion.  We have Suzuki and mediocre back up, but hopefully we will develop something before the contract for Suz is up.

 

I am not big on trading from the stable of prospects.  I would not mind Gibson for Tulo since Gibson is more likely to regress than star, but Berrios is a big NO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I have come around on the Tulowitzki thing thinking he can help us as he would be energized by playing for something everyday and I think the players on the squad would be excited about it.

I  do not thing the Twins have the players to make the deal but if I was going to do a deal, I would be willing to part with Kyle Gibson, Eddie Rosario, Alex Meyers, and Max Keplar or Danny Santana as the base of the deal if the Rockies are willing to pay some of the salary of Tuowitzki for players with that much service time and team control left. One young starter, one young outfielder a potential first baseman and relief pitcher, that would be about the top of the mark for what this team can probably afford to part with to fill the short stop spot.  To me when your in a playoff race you do what it takes to stay there and remain a contender not hope two or three years from now you have a shot.

Nothing is promised tomorrow not even today, so if you have a chance to go for it you better give it your best shot. I doubt the Twins ownership has the stomach to take on that much money from Tulowitzki though, they have never blown the budget once in there history in a go for it mode. 

Tulowitzki would be the bullet like Shannon Stewart was in the line-up that could help this team. If he is going anywhere though I doubt it will be to the Minnesota Twins.

Remind me how far we got with Shannon Stewart on the team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Community Moderator

 

so they'll be more than 9 games over .500 at the ASB?

 

I've seen you bring up the banked wins and 9 over at the ASB, but I really think there's more than just looking 1 number.

Twins records by month:

April 10-12

May 20-7

June 11-17

July 9-7

 

They had a great month in May, in the other 3 months combined they are under 500 though.  You can keep looking at May and the inflated record and assume that this team is THAT good, or that this team is still coming back down and is more than likely a 500 type ball club, which 95% of us would have been ecstatic with before the season.  

 

There are a lot of holes and I don't see how someone couldn't look to next season with E. Santana the whole season, Sano and Buxton with reps under their belts starting from Day 1, Stauffer and Boyer not in the pen, a Berrios with tons of potential getting a shot the bigs, etc and not see a team as talented or if not more talented than the one they have had on the field all year.

Edited by SwainZag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

what veterans are they trading for good, MLB ready, players? Or, are they trading for more prospects, meaning 2017 or later?

 

A major league ready catcher would be my priority. Depending on the catcher, players to trade could include, as options, (not all) Arcia, Plouffe, Polanco or any from a list of the younger (2017 or later) prospects. Again, depends on the catcher. There are several teams with an established catcher and a younger second.

 

Someone mentioned Cozart as a possible SS trade. Of course, he's rehabbing right now but I'd be willing to talk to Cincinnati about him in the offseason.

 

I would not want to trade Buxton, Berrios, Sano or Kepler for either position. Rosario maybe for the right player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am NOT in favor of going for it at the expense of potential plus major leaguers.

 

The formerly top farm system in the game still needs to sort the wheat from the chaff.

 

I don't want the Twins to trade a future Cy Young or HR champion for guys whose best years are gone.

 

A tweak at catcher seems most appropriate, as it is also an organizational weakness.

 

Trading the farm to go for it all at this point? Lunacy. 

 

Building a winning culture and mostly standing pat, letting the prospect situation sort itself out, that's what I advocate.

 

They are already miles ahead of last season. Slow and steady wins the game.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Experiment - bring up the young players and rotate them through the rest of the season, see if someone develops the hot hand that Santana had last year - Polanco? 

 

 

This has been the tactic of the past four years--disappoint in the first 60% of the season (but not stink)--then bring up the young players, rotate them... .  Which causes the rest of the season to be a total disaster.  NO!  Once the Twins decided to promote the top prospects and "start the clock", the die was cast--play the best and try to win every game and get to the playoffs NOW.  If they fail, they fail.  But it wasn't because they wouldn't play their best cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes to making trades to improve the club. Yes to bag of balls and a pack of grape flavored bubblegum for an older vet set up man or catcher in a salary dump type move that is short term.

 

Doesnt cost much. Helps the '15 season. Always the option of a re-sign. RP easier to find than catchers...but still.

 

No to the mid season BIG MOVE. Not unless it was someone under 30 with team control for a few more years. Otherwise, you are overbuying mid season when you should wait until the offseason to shop big.

 

As to why the Twins might be better next season, closer to a REAL contender, it is simply a matter of tweaks you may/can make, and Rosario, Hicks, Buxton, Sano, Gibson, May andothers more experienced, further along. Arcia and/or Vargas could be right, or closer. Polanco or Escobar may seize SS. Etc, etc, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't really know what this team is yet.  This is the first year of a resurgence that will hopefully keep this team competitive for years to come.  It's deep in prospects and young players still figuring things out.  The future is bright, no need to haphazardly patch something together to get a quick flash in the playoffs.  There are too many holes in the roster to fill before the trade deadline.  These holes can be better addressed in the off season.  If this team were only one good piece away from really having a shot then they should be serious buyers but now is not the time.  I foresee  a deal for a mid level reliever after the non-wavier deadline. 

The pieces are just starting to come together and more will fit in the years to come.  Enjoy it for what it is now and hopefully something special will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...