C'mon Escobar! A real center fielder would've had that one.

Anyone notice, Correia's ERA is below 6 now.

 

Of course I say this, then Corriea gives up a 2 run homer. Nice call!

 

What are the odds Guierrer gets in today? 100%?

What are the odds Guierrer gets in today? 100%?

 

Forearm tenderness. Day to day.

The other candidate would be Brooks Raley. The chances of him making it to Minnesota are rather slim, or should be slim. Although, with this management of the roster, you never know..

 

The bullpen's a little beat up right now, it might be time to call up another reliever.

Anyone notice, Correia's ERA is below 6 now.

Was... No longer

Anyone notice, Correia's ERA is below 6 now.

Day ain't over yet...

http://www.bubbaup.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/CitySlickers30.jpg

Brooks Raley DFA'd, claimed by Angels...

The bullpen's a little beat up right now, it might be time to call up another reliever.

Yes. Whichever one is the best fielder and hitter.

Well lost Brooks Raley to the Angels

Chris Hermann with a ground ball to the right side, for the 400th time in this young season.

Fangraphs says it's only the 382nd, but it sure seems like 400.

Forearm tenderness. Day to day.

 

I may be dense, but is this intended to be a joke?

Which player Raley or Matti G would likely be more of a long term player?

 

Seems like a bad move.

Ehhh, not a fan of this Tonkin guy. Lets send him down to make room for Eddie Guardado.

I may be dense, but is this intended to be a joke?

 

Sure hope so.

Holy cats, Tonkin is pitching

Which player Raley or Matti G would likely be more of a long term player?

The answer to this question, and all others directed at the nature of the Twins' roster decisions, is that you're not the Twins.

Nice wheels Santana

Which player Raley or Matti G would likely be more of a long term player?

 

Seems like a bad move.

 

A 25 year old with a 3.68 ERA and 19 Ks in 14 IP or a 35 year old who picks up Gardy's kids from school?

 

Seems like an easy choice.

Well lost Brooks Raley to the Angels

 

Is this actually true?

Well lost Brooks Raley to the Angels

 

Who are the Angels dropping from their 40-man that we get?

Is this actually true?

Yes

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/05/angels-claim-brooks-raley-off-waivers-from-twins.html

Short, sweet, to the point:

 

Maybe they shouldn't drop Fryer from the 40... They'll lose him

Santana behind the plate... It's time to send Santana... Ok a walk... Maybe next time.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/05/angels-claim-brooks-raley-off-waivers-from-twins.html

Good question: "Why didn't they first DFA him?"

Holy cats, Tonkin is pitching

 

Quick call up another reliever, Tonkin won't be available again till June.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/05/angels-claim-brooks-raley-off-waivers-from-twins.html

 

Oh my... That was quick...

 

Raley better be terrible and Guerrier better be good.

Hermann is wishing someone would get healthy so he can go to AAA and face pitchers he can hit.

He could drive over to Fort Wayne. The Midwest League is closer to his speed.

They lost Brooks Raley.

 

To keep Matt Guerrier.

 

Okay, have at it, boys. I'm done defending anything this front office does right now.

 

Unbelievable. I don't even care about Brooks Raley but MATT GUERRIER?