Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • entries
    4
  • comments
    34
  • views
    11,913

Hypothetical Baseball Realignment & How It Would Affect The Minnesota Twins


MidwestTwinsFan15

3,462 views

 Share

Twins Video

This was an article/idea that I wrote back originally back in 2013. I've updated it to include the changes MLB have already implemented, like removing the significance of the All-Star in the World Series Home Field Advantage.

 

Back in 2013, I had been listening to the baseball commentators, reading ESPN, SI and MLB.com about the uneven schedules pertaining to having inter-league play everyday and how people don't seem to like it. Personally, I am not a fan of the inter-league play and would prefer having a balanced schedule between the leagues.

 

Here is my proposed adjustment to the current league structure: I'm a big fan of having the pitcher hit for themselves (it makes the managers actually manage the game) but lets get real, it's time for the universal DH in both leagues.

 

Here is my realignment of the divisions: 6 divisions of 5 teams is moved to 4 divisions of 8 teams. The alignment of teams would increase geographic rivalries (to a certain extent), hopefully making travel to opposing ballparks more appealing, increase attendance, decrease team travel and increasing bottom lines (since this is what the owners want in the end).

 

The Divisions:

 

"American League"

 

North: Minnesota Twins, Chicago Cubs, Chicago White Sox, Detroit Tigers, Milwaukee Brewers, Cincinnati Reds, Cleveland Indians and Colorado Rockies

 

West: San Diego Padres, San Francisco Giants, LA Dodgers, Anaheim Angels, Oakland A's, Arizona Diamondbacks, Seattle Mariners, and Vancouver BC (Proposed new team)

 

"National League"

 

South: Miami Marlins, Atlanta Braves, Texas Rangers, Houston Astros, Kansas City Royals, St. Louis Cardinals, San Juan, Puerto Rico (Tampa Bay moves), and San Antonio, TX (Proposed new team)

 

East: Boston Red Sox, Philadelphia Phillies, New York Mets, New York Yankees, Washington Nationals, Baltimore Orioles, Pittsburgh Pirates, and Toronto Blue Jays

 

This alignment also expands the coverage of baseball more into Canada, which has a big baseball following, along with adding a team in Puerto Rico, a baseball rich area.

 

I chose San Juan, Vancouver and San Antonio because of the the size of their markets and location need within the proposed league. These locations are all currently larger than the following MLB Markets: Milwaukee, Cleveland, Kansas City, Cincinnati and Pittsburgh.

 

The Playoffs:

 

Playoffs would include the Top 2 teams from each division. The #1 (home) team (North) would play the opposing divisions #2 (away) team (West) and visa versa in a 5-game series (this would be the current "Wild Card Round").

 

The winners of their respective series would move onto the "AL or NL Championship Series Round." This series would include a 7-game series with teams playing for the American or National League Pennant along with a trip to the World Series.

 

The World Series would remain the same, a 7-game series, as it currently is stands. With the team with the best overall regular season record determining the home-field advantage.

 

This would be a big shake up to the current format of baseball but I believe this would have its advantages that fans, players and owners would enjoy. I understand that it currently eliminates the 2nd wild card team but lets not water down the playoffs with additional teams.

 

In regards on how this proposed realignment would affect the Twins, I would say that it would not be in the best interest for them. Soley based on the 2017 results, this is where the Twins would have ended up to finish the season...not in the playoffs:

 

Cleveland Indians - 102 Wins

Chicago Cubs - 92 Wins

Colorado Rockies - 87 Wins

Milwaukee Brewers - 86 Wins

Minnesota Twins - 85 Wins

Cincinnati Reds - 68 Wins

Chicago White Sox - 67 Wins

Detroit Tigers - 64 Wins

 

When we look at the payrolls for each of these organizations (Numbers from 2017 Opening Day) - we continue to fall towards the middle of the pack. Interesting to note that the team with the largest payroll also had the worst record in 2017. If the Twins were to raise their annual payroll to about $125 Million - would that help us climb this proposed standing?

 

Detroit Tigers - $199 Million

Chicago Cubs - $172 Million

Colorado Rockies - $130 Million

Cleveland Indians - $124 Million

Minnesota Twins - $108 Million

Chicago White Sox - $99 Million

Cincinnati Reds - $93 Million

Milwaukee Brewers - $63 Million

 

The idea was to create discussion and have a little fun with hypotheticals. Would be interesting to see how the addition of the DH to the former national league teams would affect their overall record and if that would be a positive or negative to the Twins playoff hopes.

 

Any thoughts or ideas to add?

 Share

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

Twins had 85 wins .    Not a bad idea but probably more fair to take  Division winners and then the top two teams period rather than the 2nd place team in each division.   For example, this format  in 1987 would have had the 85 win Twins and the 83 win Royals while excluding the 91 win Brewers and the 89 win Yankees.    I would also be ok with the 3rd best record making it and 4th and 5th playing a play in game.    All sorts of possibilities.

Link to comment

 

Twins had 85 wins .    Not a bad idea but probably more fair to take  Division winners and then the top two teams period rather than the 2nd place team in each division.   For example, this format  in 1987 would have had the 85 win Twins and the 83 win Royals while excluding the 91 win Brewers and the 89 win Yankees.    I would also be ok with the 3rd best record making it and 4th and 5th playing a play in game.    All sorts of possibilities.

Thanks for the catch on the error! And yes, all sorts of possibilities could come into play.

Link to comment

I like it! I like the new divisions, the new teams, and trimming the playoffs by 2 teams. My only quibble is that there wouldn't much of an incentive to win the division - the only advantage for winning the division vs just making the playoffs would be home field advantage in the first round. What I like best about the Wild Card game right now is that it really rewards winning the division as you don't have to play in a single game elimination.

 

Here's an idea people will probably hate. :-) What if you kept everything in your proposal but instead of having 2 wild cards in each league you have 4, with the wild cards going to one-game playoffs to determine who advances to the next round to face the division winners? This would expand the playoffs rather than contract them, which is probably a negative, but would increase the reward for winning the division, which I think is a positive.

 

 

Link to comment

 

I like it! I like the new divisions, the new teams, and trimming the playoffs by 2 teams. My only quibble is that there wouldn't much of an incentive to win the division - the only advantage for winning the division vs just making the playoffs would be home field advantage in the first round. What I like best about the Wild Card game right now is that it really rewards winning the division as you don't have to play in a single game elimination.

 

Here's an idea people will probably hate. :-) What if you kept everything in your proposal but instead of having 2 wild cards in each league you have 4, with the wild cards going to one-game playoffs to determine who advances to the next round to face the division winners? This would expand the playoffs rather than contract them, which is probably a negative, but would increase the reward for winning the division, which I think is a positive.

Makes some good sense. Doesn't make the playoffs smaller. Totally like the idea of having of the Wild Cards in a one game play-off putting a nice incentive to win the division outright and having some good meaning to it. 

 

Link to comment

It took awhile but I now prefer the smaller divisions, but I'm pretty easy, I don't fuss much about change. Just so long as the Twins don't get shafted and end up in a division where everyone else is in a different time zone.

Link to comment

This proposal has been published a few places (recently SI).

 

East: Atlanta, Baltimore, Cincinnati, Miami, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Tampa Bay, Washington

 

North: Boston, Cleveland, Detroit, Minnesota, Montreal, New York Yankees, New York Mets, Toronto

 

Midwest: Chicago Cubs, Chicago White Sox, Colorado, Houston, Kansas City, Milwaukee, St. Louis, Texas

 

West: Anaheim, Arizona, Los Angeles, Oakland, Portland, San Diego, San Francisco and Seattle

 

I hate it for the Twins. They need to be in the Midwest. Yours is much better.

Link to comment

 

This proposal has been published a few places (recently SI).

East: Atlanta, Baltimore, Cincinnati, Miami, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Tampa Bay, Washington

North: Boston, Cleveland, Detroit, Minnesota, Montreal, New York Yankees, New York Mets, Toronto

Midwest: Chicago Cubs, Chicago White Sox, Colorado, Houston, Kansas City, Milwaukee, St. Louis, Texas

West: Anaheim, Arizona, Los Angeles, Oakland, Portland, San Diego, San Francisco and Seattle

I hate it for the Twins. They need to be in the Midwest. Yours is much better.

Yes - I saw this the other day as well. Absolutely hate it. Basically everything in the Eastern Time Zone and the payrolls we would have to compete against would be ridiculous. If the Twins were to be put into this proposed division, we would be the doormats, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...