Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • entries
    9
  • comments
    117
  • views
    5,192

One Guy's Take on the Roster Makeup


IndianaTwin

2,928 views

 Share

Twins Video

The end is in sight. While I'll have one eye on Caitlin Clark and her Iowa Hawkeye team's amazingness the next six weeks (hopefully), it's great to see Spring Training starting this week. Much speculation has been made about the roster, so I'll add my read on how I see things shaking out. Here goes: 

Offensively, I see the Opening Day roster as:

  • Group A: C - Jeffers, Vazquez
  • Group B: 2B/SS/3B - Polanco, Correa, Miranda, Farmer, Gordon
  • Group C: 1B/LF/RF/DH - Kirilloff, Gallo, Kepler, Larnach
  • Group D: CF - Buxton, Taylor

They'll move around, of course, but this provides a framework. The other three position players on the 40-man roster and healthy are Julien, Wallner and Celestino. If one of the guys in Group B gets hurt, the door opens for Julien. If a Group C player gets hurt, the door opens for Wallner. If a Group D player gets hurt, it could be Celestino, but with Gordon's (and even Gallo's) ability to play CF, it could mean either Wallner or Julien, so that Celestino stays in St. Paul.

If a catcher gets hurt, they have to make a corresponding 40-man move, but they have Wolters, Sisco and Greiner in St. Paul and Paddack and Canterino (and maybe Lewis) as possibilities to go on the 60-Day IL. And hey, it's a catcher. If they get hurt, it could well be the 60-day for him anyway!

I didn't mention Lewis, but momma always said, "We'll cross that bridge when we get to it." When Lewis is healthy, something will have happened to provide a spot for him. And if not, awesome! As for other prospects not on the 40-man, they'll take a number and get worked in as spots become available. And spots will become available. Injuries happen. So does suckitude. 

On the pitching side, the starting pool looks like:

  • Group 1; Ryan, Gray, PLopez, Mahle and Maeda as the intended starting five.
  • Group 2: Ober, Varland, Winder and Woods Richardson are all on the 40-man and have made starts in the majors, so any are options to step into the rotation when one from Group 1 goes on the IL. Otherwise, it's assumed they'll start in St. Paul. They're listed in the order of when they made appearances, so that may be a clue as to the order.
  • Group 3: Paddack can go on the 60-man as needed, but it's assumed that he'll get starts at some point. 
  • Group 4: Dobnak, Rodriguez and Sanchez are also in St. Paul, but not on the 40-man. I think they'll churn through Group 2 before going here, but they are available if needed. By the time it gets to these guys, at least one of the injuries will likely have been of the 60-day variety, creating another spot on the 40-man.
  • Group 5: Balazovic and Headrick are two guys on the 40-man that I'm guessing they aren't ready to move them to the pen yet. With great starts, they could theoretically move to the back of Group 2.

The bullpen looks like: 

  • Group 6: Duran, JLopez, Jax, Alcala, Thielbar, Moran, Megill, Pagan as the assumed bullpen. Alcala, Moran and Megill have options.
  • Group 7: Sands and Henriquez. Sands only pitched in relief in August and September, but it was usually multiple innings. That could be a sign of moving him to the pen full time. Henriquez bounced back and forth between starting and relieving, and I wonder if he might move to relieving full time as well. They could join Alcala, Moran and Megill on the St. Paul shuffle. Conceivably, either of these could bump one of the guys in Group 5, particularly given that they are viable multi-inning guys.
  • Group 8: Coulombe, DeLeon, Ortega are three guys not on the 40-man, but who have major league experience. Once Canterino goes on the 60-day IL, any of these could be added to the 40-man in his spot.

With that in mind, several observations: 

  1. I really like the flexibility they have created on the position player side. I also don't trade Kepler, unless it's for a right-handed hitting 1B or OF, but that's just tinkering. If it was going to happen, it would have happened earlier.
  2. Groups 1-3 make 10 starting pitchers that I can feel good about as options. And Group 4 is a nice group to have in St. Paul, hopefully beating down the door with good performances, and otherwise providing enough starts to keep the prospect pipeline flowing.
  3. I've been one of the group wishing they would have signed a Fulmer-type for the bullpen. As I play this out, I'm not that sure it's a big deal. He'd add another player to Group 6, but it feels like they have enough options to not worry about that. 
  4. Pagan deserves his own observation. Folks want him gone. I see one of two things happening. Best case scenario is that he pitches like he did the last couple months and earns his keep. But I think he'll be on a relatively short leash. Consider last year -- when Duffey and Smith stunk and they had other bodies available, they cut bait and DFAed both. What was different about Pagan was that he had another year of control, so there was hope of a turnaround. Now that he's in the last year of control, I think his leash will be much shorter.
  5. I think this is a playoff contender. From what I gather, this group is WAY deeper across the board than Cleveland or Chicago.
  6. Ace/Schmace. I hate the articles debating what classifies as an "ace" and how an "ace" is needed in the playoffs, but here's the way I view it:
    1. Are any Twins starters Hall of Famers? No.
    2. Are any of them Sure-Fire Top 10 (or 15) MLB Starters, or however you want to define this "Ace" term? Probably not.
    3. BUT, and I've got a big but(t), I think that any of the guys in Group 1 or Group 3 can pitch like an "Ace" on any given night and even for an extended run. Consider Maeda's 2020, for example. And if the Twins have made it into the playoffs, it's likely because at least one has been pitching like an "Ace," so I'll take my chances.
    4. I'm sure we're biased and have rose-colored glasses on Ober, Winder, et. al, but if you look at the depth charts of other teams, there's very few that have the kind of depth we, both in the top five and particularly in the top 10. Goodness -- we just waived A.J. Alexy and he shows up as the No. 7 starter on one list for The Team That Shall Not Be Named.  

What did I miss? 

Besides noting that we're at T-minus 44 days and counting to Opening Day. 

 Share

17 Comments


Recommended Comments

IMO Ober should be in the pen, at least until we need another starter. He would lengthen the pen and with something deceptive about his delivery, should be very good there. Going 2 innings or so a couple times a week would also reduce the injuries, which there is a history of for him.

Link to comment

Excellent take on things. The only place I disagree with you is Randy Dobnak, If he is healthy and the need arises I think he goes right behind Ober. There paying him 1.5 million this year so If he's healthy and pitching well and the team needs a starter hes going to be used. Also you are absolutely right about Caitlin Clark, She's a human highlight show all by herself.

Link to comment

I love this!  I am high on Julien but lets cool the jets a bit.  He has less than 800 minor league at bats and has never played AAA yet.  Also, if healthy all Spring, Ober will be one of the 5 starters in the rotation.

Link to comment

Interesting overview.

Pitching makes perfect sense to me.

Everyday guys. Here we go again…….

Gordon played 6% of last year’s games in IF……..only because we were out of bodies and he was still standing. He started 60% of the games in OF ……40% in LF & 20% in CF. (I see it growing to 50% in LF & 30% in CF in ‘23) Don’t see how a guy has BA that’s 3rd or 4th on roster in ‘22 & has 28 doubles in 405 AB’s …..plays OF in first real full season in SHOW …..starts 2/3 of games on schedule & is slated as our 6th infielder in ‘23?

1B is Kirilof/Miranda/Gallo

Farmer will play 30 games v. LH pitching at 3B, while Miranda moves to 1B. When Miranda - CC - Polanco rest, that’s another 25 starts each IF everyone stays healthy. 

I can’t believe that FO would expect Taylor to play CF in front of Gordon v. RH pitching!

Taylor is an INSURANCE policy against major health issues. He’s the CF v. LH pitching while Buxton DH’s…..30 games. Buxton tries to start 80 games in CF. Gordon starts 50 games in CF. Taylor pinch hits v. LH pitching - pinch runs - late inning Defense as needed. A true utility player!

Larnach is DH - some LF. Gallo is some LF 30 games…..RF 50 games…….1B 20 games…….DH 15-20 games. Kepler is 110 games in RF.

Everyone plays 110 - 135 games except Taylor & Jeffers…..maybe 75 games & 55 games respectively.

Link to comment
10 minutes ago, miracleb said:

I love this!  I am high on Julien but lets cool the jets a bit.  He has less than 800 minor league at bats and has never played AAA yet.  Also, if healthy all Spring, Ober will be one of the 5 starters in the rotation.

Who will be the other 4 starters if Ober is one of the 5? 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Steve55436 said:

I really like this, with one exception: Jettison Megill and add Ober to pen. 1) Megill is terrible. 2) Staff could use a swing man to plug rotation, and Ober is the right choice here. 3) Ober proved his worth. He deserves to stick. 

Megill is bad? Um Pagan is Horrible. Would be glad to see both not on our roster and bring some of the good young arms up and get them experience. Have a distinct feeling that Maeta will be moved to a pitching starved team.. and there will be many!! 

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Karbo said:

IMO Ober should be in the pen, at least until we need another starter. He would lengthen the pen and with something deceptive about his delivery, should be very good there. Going 2 innings or so a couple times a week would also reduce the injuries, which there is a history of for him.

First, keep in mind that this is what I think will happen, not necessarily what I think should happen.

In reality, I don't see too many people doing the bounce-back-and-forth thing between the rotation and bullpen. In addition, I did a lookback a few weeks ago to see when they've first used their No. 6 pitcher and, on average, it was something like April 15. With a guy like Ober that's had some injury issues, I think they will want to have him on a predictable throwing schedule (including on off days), which is much easier to do as a starter.

That April 15 date also doesn't take into account the possibility of one of the Group 1 starters not making it to Opening Day. Let's please not have that happen, but it's a pretty common occurrence across MLB.

So with that, I think there's at least a 50/50 chance he'll be needed to start a game by mid-April, so I'd rather send him to St. Paul for a start or even two before that's needed, in order to keep him at starter length.

See also my next comment. 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Steve55436 said:

I really like this, with one exception: Jettison Megill and add Ober to pen. 1) Megill is terrible. 2) Staff could use a swing man to plug rotation, and Ober is the right choice here. 3) Ober proved his worth. He deserves to stick. 

I don't disagree with you on Ober deserving to stick. I just think that if health allows, he'll be the odd man out. However, given history across MLB, he won't be out for long. He'll start for the Twins by mid-April, late-April at the least. And if he's still stuck in St. Paul because the other five guys stayed healthy (and effective), that's an awesome problem to have!

HOWEVER, if they decide that a guy who has never exceeded 108 innings in a season is unlikely to last as a starter, so they want to move him to the bullpen, then sure, put him in Group 6 or 7 and have that long man.

But don't put him in the bullpen with the hopes of bringing him back as a starter. And I realize that you didn't specify that part. If you're meaning move him to the bullpen full time, I don't fully disagree, but I suspect the Twins aren't there yet.  

Oh, and I do put Megill on the Short Leash List. I like his career 3.16 SO/W ratio, his 3.29 FIP from last year and his ability to go more than an inning, which he did on several occasions, but I could easily see him as a DFA candidate if he gets off to a rocky start and they feel like there are St. Paul options. He's also in the group with an option, so he could be sent down as easily as dropped. 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Steve55436 said:

I really like this, with one exception: Jettison Megill and add Ober to pen. 1) Megill is terrible. 2) Staff could use a swing man to plug rotation, and Ober is the right choice here. 3) Ober proved his worth. He deserves to stick. 

And yes, welcome to TD!

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Ricky Vaughn said:

Excellent take on things. The only place I disagree with you is Randy Dobnak, If he is healthy and the need arises I think he goes right behind Ober. There paying him 1.5 million this year so If he's healthy and pitching well and the team needs a starter hes going to be used. Also you are absolutely right about Caitlin Clark, She's a human highlight show all by herself.

I wasn't sure what to do with Dobnak. WIth the contract, I could agree with you, or maybe even slot him in before Ober. The only thing that holds Dobnak back is the need to open a 40-man spot.

We're not privy to these conversations, but I wonder if a part of his accepting the minor league assignment was a commitment from the team to give him one of the first shots if he's healthy.

 

As to Caitlin, I've had more fun watching Iowa women's basketball this season than any team (any gender. any sport) over the past few years. Living in Indiana, I've only been able to see three games in person this year, but I'm fortunate to have a work trip scheduled to the Iowa City area over the first weekend of NCAA tournament. I've been watching my email to jump on tickets as soon as they are available. Last season they started selling with a few weeks left in the regular season, when it was pretty clear they had a good shot of hosting. With only four games left (two against top 10 teams), I think it's almost a given they are going to host. The selection committee is smart enough to know they'll get a sellout if Iowa hosts.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, miracleb said:

I love this!  I am high on Julien but lets cool the jets a bit.  He has less than 800 minor league at bats and has never played AAA yet.  Also, if healthy all Spring, Ober will be one of the 5 starters in the rotation.

Agree on a strong preference to Julien to get time in AAA. 

Interesting that amidst my typing comments, I see this post regarding the Twins rotation: https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/?s=ober. I have wondered about a six-man rotation if all are healthy. The downside is that it shortens the bullpen. Otherwise, I see the health of the other starters being the primary determinant of whether he starts in the Twins rotation vs. the one in St. Paul.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, JD-TWINS said:

Interesting overview.

Pitching makes perfect sense to me.

Everyday guys. Here we go again…….

Gordon played 6% of last year’s games in IF……..only because we were out of bodies and he was still standing. He started 60% of the games in OF ……40% in LF & 20% in CF. (I see it growing to 50% in LF & 30% in CF in ‘23) Don’t see how a guy has BA that’s 3rd or 4th on roster in ‘22 & has 28 doubles in 405 AB’s …..plays OF in first real full season in SHOW …..starts 2/3 of games on schedule & is slated as our 6th infielder in ‘23?

1B is Kirilof/Miranda/Gallo

Farmer will play 30 games v. LH pitching at 3B, while Miranda moves to 1B. When Miranda - CC - Polanco rest, that’s another 25 starts each IF everyone stays healthy. 

I can’t believe that FO would expect Taylor to play CF in front of Gordon v. RH pitching!

Taylor is an INSURANCE policy against major health issues. He’s the CF v. LH pitching while Buxton DH’s…..30 games. Buxton tries to start 80 games in CF. Gordon starts 50 games in CF. Taylor pinch hits v. LH pitching - pinch runs - late inning Defense as needed. A true utility player!

Larnach is DH - some LF. Gallo is some LF 30 games…..RF 50 games…….1B 20 games…….DH 15-20 games. Kepler is 110 games in RF.

Everyone plays 110 - 135 games except Taylor & Jeffers…..maybe 75 games & 55 games respectively.

I probably wasn't as clear as I could have been. I agree that Gordon may end up actually playing more games in the OF than IF, particularly given that Correa and Polanco are perhaps the two most likely guys on the roster to play 140+ games.

I put Gordon in group B because he CAN play the infield, whereas the other OFs are OF/1B-only. That and because I could see Julien being the callup if Gordon is the one injured, particularly if it's a short stint and they don't want to use a 40-man spot for a Willi Castro-type. 

 

My post was more about roster makeup than actual usage, but I think your take on this being a roster that's designed to have a lot of guys in the 110-140 range of games played is right on. I extend a bit on the top end, primarily for Correa and Polanco (and maybe Miranda, if he continues to progress). Based on past patterns, I think catcher will be pretty close to a 80/80 split if both are healthy. Maybe as far as 90/70, but not too far outside of that.

Link to comment
7 hours ago, Steve55436 said:

I really like this, with one exception: Jettison Megill and add Ober to pen. 1) Megill is terrible. 2) Staff could use a swing man to plug rotation, and Ober is the right choice here. 3) Ober proved his worth. He deserves to stick. 

Megill looks horrible, but he has decent stuff. Is he  headcase or just doesn't know how to pitch. His mom is nice looking too!😉

Link to comment

Nit pick. Very unlikely that the Twins will give Canterino MLB time and salary by putting him on the 60-day IL. They can and will do so for Lewis and Paddack if space is needed on the 40-man and active roster.

Danny Coulombe could provide a third lefty and take one of the 40-man spots now held by Paddack/Lewis. Not flashy, but pretty good since the Twins picked him up. 

I'm not sold on Megill either, but he has a high-velo fastball and a big loopy curve. He seemed to fall in love with one or the other when pitching for the Twins with less than satisfactory results. Coulombe could probably take his place or if the Twins want a multiple inning guy in his place, that makes sense and Henriquez could fill and fit that role. 

Ober is another possibility, either as the sixth guy in the rotation (only lasted three weeks that way last year) or a swing man waiting for an opportunity in the rotation. I am not in the camp of converting Ober to the bullpen unless it is deemed that he has a better chance of avoiding the IL by converting.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...