Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

What Would it Take to be Average?


SportsGuyDalton

2,710 views

 Share

Twins Video

As we near the final quarter of the MLB season, it’s a good time to take stock of Twins hitters’ performance this season.

To gauge which Twins hitters are having good seasons, I will compare each hitter’s 2022 numbers to their "average" season, then calculate how each player needs to perform for the remainder of 2022 to reach their average statline. In other words, what would it take for each player to have their average season? This approach has its flaws and doesn’t work for rookies, but it’s a fun thought exercise. This post is a little math-heavy -- I'll lay out some simple examples along the way. Let’s give it a go.

First, I calculate what an "average" 2022 season would be for each player. I start by estimating the number of games each player will play this season based on the share of games they have played to this point. For example, if a player has played 2/3 of all games so far, I estimate they will play 2/3 of the remaining games for a total of 108 games played (2/3 of 162) .

Then, using this final 2022 games-played number, I calculate how Twins batters would perform in the full 2022 season based only on their 162-game career averages from before this season. For example, if a player hit 30 doubles per 162 games before 2022 and is projected to play 2/3 of all games in 2022, their "average" 2022 season would include 108 games played and 20 doubles (2/3 of 30).

image.png.7349bd21d608933acce088ce80066390.png

To assess whether a player is performing well or poorly in 2022, I compare their “average” season (above) to their real 2022 statistics, and calculate how each player would need to perform for the rest of the season in order to finish with their average season statline. For example, Gio Urshela's average projections estimate he will hit 14 homeruns in 2022; he currently has 11 homeruns, meaning he needs to hit 3 more before the season ends to have an average season.

This helps us gauge performance because, if a player needs to finish the year hitting like prime Barry Bonds to have their average season, that’s an indication they have had a rough season so far. Conversely, a player is probably having a good season if they can reach their career averages by hitting like a slumping Nick Punto for the final month and a half. 

The table below shows how each batter would need to perform in the final quarter of the season to finish 2022 with their "average" statline.

The red boxes highlight areas where players have a lot of work left to do. Green highlights areas where players are in good shape.

image.png.d77b932625dba29323fc724c3d82411f.png

It’s immediately clear that Gary Sanchez and Max Kepler are unlikely to reach their career averages. I'm not holding my breath for them to combine for 33 homeruns and an OPS around 1.000 in the team's final 46 games.

Carlos Correa has been mildly underwhelming across the board in 2022, which is reflected by the hot stretch needed to achieve his average season. It’s not entirely out of the question for Correa to heat up and hit .290/.372/.626 with 9 homeruns the rest of the way, but it’s getting less likely by the day.

Polanco and Buxton are interesting cases, posting homerun and walk numbers that blow away their career averages, but both players have sacrificed their batting averages to do so. I think Twins fans have mixed feelings about their approaches to hitting.

Urshela has been solid all season, which shows in the mediocre numbers he needs to reach his career averages.

And finally, clearly, Luis Arraez has been outstanding in 2022. He could probably hit .237 down the stretch with one arm tied behind his back.

Thanks for reading!

 

 Share

6 Comments


Recommended Comments

Interesting, and seems to comport with the eye test. Kepler and Sanchez are having lousy years and Correa has been decent but below standard. He has a chance though to get back to his "normal" performance, whereas Kepler and Sanchez really don't.

The other interesting thing is really to show how much both Buxton and Polanco have sacrificed average for power. I frankly like to see both of them dial that back a little since I think for this team to be successful on offense it has to be a string hits together team. Not enough table setters to be a single and a blast team.

Anyway, interesting stuff.

Link to comment

Very interesting stuff.

Gary really stands out to me in that he has already exceeded his average numbers of doubles, but needs 20 more HRs. Prior to this year, he had 78 career doubles and 138 HRs, and not a single season in which he hit more doubles than HRs, so I guess he is getting pretty unlucky in that his deep fly balls aren't going out as much as they did in previous years. His statcast numbers indicate that he is hitting the ball just as hard as in previous years, so it may just be luck, or it may be from changing home fields.

 

I just want to point out that the OPS numbers probably aren't correct. Buxton has a .843 OPS so far this year, so he wouldn't need a .907 OPS the rest of the season to end up with a .770 OPS.

Link to comment
7 hours ago, Rik19753 said:

I just want to point out that the OPS numbers probably aren't correct. Buxton has a .843 OPS so far this year, so he wouldn't need a .907 OPS the rest of the season to end up with a .770 OPS.

Yes this is good to point out! Thanks! Buxton kind of screws up the rest of season projections because he already has so many more HRs than the "average" season.

I didn't explicitly make sure OPS matched at the end of the season. Instead, I had each player end the season with as many at-bats, walks/HBP, singles, doubles, triples, and HRs as their "average" season (I only showed some of the projected stats in the table to keep the table size reasonable), then calculated AVG, SLG, and OPS from those numbers. If a player ends the season with the exact statline of the "average" season, the OPS calculations work out.

In Buxton's case, he is going to have a better season than the "average" because he would finish the season with as many singles, doubles, and triples as the average season but more HRs because he can't hit -10 HRs the rest of the way, so his final OPS would be higher.

So you're totally right, the Buxton OPS number is not exactly what he needs for reach the "average" season (I think Arraez' remaining OPS might be slightly off too, since he has more than 4 HRs). The .907 OPS could be interpreted as the OPS Buxton needs to reach the number of singles/doubles/triples for his "average" season, assuming he hits 0 HRs the rest of the way.

Link to comment

Buxton is a talent but having a guy hit .220 in the top 3 of your order is a problem. Polanco & Kepler batting 40 & 25 points under their career averages in the 4 hole, combined with Buxton & an underperforming Correa spell stagnant offense & problems winning games!!! Hence 62-58.

Miranda - Urshella - Arraez - Gordon have all exceeded expectations at differing levels. They are carrying the offense.

The roll players can’t drive the bus!

Committed long term to Kepler/Polanco/Buxton with $35 million on Correa - they are ALL BLAH or below……anything Buxton has done with HR’s he has leveled with a lack of singles & an abundance of K’s!! 

The lack of “average” on offense, as you point out, is costing us the season - not the inconsistent bullpen - although, I’m sure one could create a statistical argument that bullpen is close behind in blame.

 

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...