Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • entries
    194
  • comments
    801
  • views
    409,776

I need relief - real relief from the relievers


mikelink45

3,050 views

 Share

Twins Video

blog-0687104001535159160.jpgI know that RP refers to relief pitching – for me it amounts to Really Poor baseball. KC won a series and did damage to the rest of baseball just like the jerk with the bomb that makes me take off my shoes at the airport. We have always had some relief pitchers, but now we have a stat head jamboree of pitchers. No longer is half the team pitchers and half batters, now we have 2 -3 on the bench and a bullpen that has to add folding chairs. Does this help the game? No.

 

Do any of you enjoy the visits to the mound, the time it takes to run in, the 8 pitches from an already warmed up pitcher who might throw one pitch to one batter and then we repeat this exciting or should I say dramatic spectacle again.

 

We are now in an era when wins do not count any more, starting pitchers are actually one inning relievers – how exciting is that. The starting pitcher is saved from facing the strongest part of the lineup! Why is he starting? Openers are used for beer and other necessary boredom relieving beverages.

 

Pitchers per game is now 4.24 per team, in our World Series Years of 1991 (3.13), 1987 (2.89) and 1965 (2.69). Wins counted then because pitchers were in the game long enough to actually dominate the game – I love the Marichal and Spahn complete game 16 inning affair won by the giants (even though Spahn was my pitching hero and the Braves (Milwaukee – not Atlanta) were my favorite team). By the way Spahn started 665 games and completed 382.

 

How about Robin Roberts throwing 28 straight complete games for the Phillies? Or Nolan Ryan throws 235 pitches, strikes out 19, during an 13 inning effort. Right now Berrios is tied for the lead in complete games with 2. Going back to our Series years – McDowell (WS) – 15 in 1991, Roger Clemens (Bos) 18 in 1987, and Sandy Koufax (Dodgers) 27 in 1965.

 

It should be noted that neither Spahn nor Ryan had their arms fall off after those feats.

 

A Koufax/Marichal game was must see. Great pitchers were the draw. Who goes to the park to watch the pitching match up now? Oh boy I wonder who the Opener is today? Yuck, I had to pause to let my stomach settle and to take another shot of whiskey. Oh wait I might miss Astudillo throwing melons to the plate.

 

I do not even know these players – Boxberger from AZ is in 85% of fantasy leagues – who is he? Who is Matthew Strahm? Do I care? Fantasy Pros lists 301 relief pitchers. Who will pay to see them pitch? Yawn. I leave after 7 – I don’t care anymore – Jim Kaat was right, but the thing is I am moving that to 6 innings and if there is an Opener I come in the second inning.

 

Give me back baseball. In fact give me starters who throw complete games, batters that bunt when the shift is on, players who steal bases and do hit and run. Limit the team to three pitchers per game. And please some team challenge this nonsense and open up the game with action, not just strikeouts and home runs.

 Share

6 Comments


Recommended Comments

 

I also heard that Spahn and Marichal would walk 20 miles barefoot - uphill - both ways - to and from the ballpark before and after each start.   Kids these days.

That might be true, but I would walk that just to see them pitch again.  That is why wins counted in their days.  

Link to comment

 

I also heard that Spahn and Marichal would walk 20 miles barefoot - uphill - both ways - to and from the ballpark before and after each start.   Kids these days.

 

Yeah, but Spahn and Marichal had nothing on Will White, who completed all 75 games he started in 1879 for a manly 680 innings pitched. I'm sure there's no correlation with extreme arm fatigue here, but he averaged 2.6 K/9 over his career. His arm might not have fallen off, but Spahn averaged 4.4 K/9.

 

Look, the game has changed and it will never go back to how it used to be. It's evolved and it will continue to evolve. I'm certain there was somebody a hundred years ago who told everyone who would listen about how sick and tired they were of catchers wearing masks and fielders using gloves.

 

Appreciate the game for what it was; respect, admire and celebrate the players who stood head and shoulders above their peers in a different era, when the game was played differently. But denigrating today's pitchers because they don't complete games like Spahn did is akin to denigrating Spahn because he never had the strikeouts that today's pitchers do.

Link to comment

 

Yeah, but Spahn and Marichal had nothing on Will White, who completed all 75 games he started in 1879 for a manly 680 innings pitched. I'm sure there's no correlation with extreme arm fatigue here, but he averaged 2.6 K/9 over his career. His arm might not have fallen off, but Spahn averaged 4.4 K/9.

 

Look, the game has changed and it will never go back to how it used to be. It's evolved and it will continue to evolve. I'm certain there was somebody a hundred years ago who told everyone who would listen about how sick and tired they were of catchers wearing masks and fielders using gloves.

 

Appreciate the game for what it was; respect, admire and celebrate the players who stood head and shoulders above their peers in a different era, when the game was played differently. But denigrating today's pitchers because they don't complete games like Spahn did is akin to denigrating Spahn because he never had the strikeouts that today's pitchers do.

I cannot agree with this.  I do admire pitchers like Verlander, Kershaw, Bumgartner, but the difference with the old 19th century game does not hold for me.  Even though I do enjoy reading about it.

 

The pride to not strike out meant that the Ks of the 50's - 2000 meant that success in striking out a batter meant something.  ESPN had a great story about Albert Pujols and how much he hates to strikeout.   Albert has a lot of HRs, but in relationship to our Sano and other sluggers he had nothing. In fact, despite having 633 HRs, in 18 years he never once struck out 100 times. 

 

I am glad to still enjoy the game, but I do not have to prefer the way the game has changed over the wonderful decades I have loved the game.

Link to comment

Great share and write up. The example comparing a pitcher in the softball era of baseball is really stretching to try to discount your observations and laments. Plus, he never saw any of those pitchers, either, or watched any of those games. 

 

I like to see the game evolve. Some of the evolutions are better than others. I like the move toward playing baseball instead of trying to take someone out on the base paths and at home plate. I hate that a pitcher gets no real punishment for hitting a batter. I hope that they make a rule to stop unnecessary players from coming on the field for a "have you back" episode (so childish), like in basketball. I hope to see automated strike and ball calling, and have a consistent strike zone that rewards the perfect take and the perfect pitch, instead of a pompous umpire calling it wrong. 

 

But I do miss some things. Mostly I enjoy the rich history of the game. Just as many never know the history of the game, many never really know the history of the last 100 and 200 years (or more) of the human race. To study it is not a 2 second internet bit. Some will, though, and pass it on. Today's stars may be worthy of being included in the history 50 years from now, and most won't.

 

The thing I miss the most about going to the games is the sounds of baseball. Dodger Stadium, two years ago, revamped the PA and got a DJ. The sounds of the ball park, the stadium, the chatter, the heckling..... are all now drowned out by incessant noise and volume. Angel Stadium is also super loud, even before Dodger Staduim. That is just the LA area, but the trend is really in all ball parks. It may be music, fake PA cheering, promotions, ball park commercials, etc....... but it is all 5 times or more louder than it needs to be. I look around and at least half of the crowd in my field of vision are looking at their phones, and missing the game. They never just let the sounds of baseball, that I so loved, get through the din. I like to go to minor league games, too, and you can still get some of the real sounds of baseball there, but the,y too, are driving up the unnecessary volume and bombarding the audience with crap that they think they need to attract a younger audience. 

 

Regardless of the changes, I still love baseball, as a pastime and a sport to watch and follow, more than any other.... (except hang gliding and skydiving, but that is not watching.)

Link to comment

 

Great share and write up. The example comparing a pitcher in the softball era of baseball is really stretching to try to discount your observations and laments. Plus, he never saw any of those pitchers, either, or watched any of those games. 

 

I like to see the game evolve. Some of the evolutions are better than others. I like the move toward playing baseball instead of trying to take someone out on the base paths and at home plate. I hate that a pitcher gets no real punishment for hitting a batter. I hope that they make a rule to stop unnecessary players from coming on the field for a "have you back" episode (so childish), like in basketball. I hope to see automated strike and ball calling, and have a consistent strike zone that rewards the perfect take and the perfect pitch, instead of a pompous umpire calling it wrong. 

 

But I do miss some things. Mostly I enjoy the rich history of the game. Just as many never know the history of the game, many never really know the history of the last 100 and 200 years (or more) of the human race. To study it is not a 2 second internet bit. Some will, though, and pass it on. Today's stars may be worthy of being included in the history 50 years from now, and most won't.

 

The thing I miss the most about going to the games is the sounds of baseball. Dodger Stadium, two years ago, revamped the PA and got a DJ. The sounds of the ball park, the stadium, the chatter, the heckling..... are all now drowned out by incessant noise and volume. Angel Stadium is also super loud, even before Dodger Staduim. That is just the LA area, but the trend is really in all ball parks. It may be music, fake PA cheering, promotions, ball park commercials, etc....... but it is all 5 times or more louder than it needs to be. I look around and at least half of the crowd in my field of vision are looking at their phones, and missing the game. They never just let the sounds of baseball, that I so loved, get through the din. I like to go to minor league games, too, and you can still get some of the real sounds of baseball there, but the,y too, are driving up the unnecessary volume and bombarding the audience with crap that they think they need to attract a younger audience. 

 

Regardless of the changes, I still love baseball, as a pastime and a sport to watch and follow, more than any other.... (except hang gliding and skydiving, but that is not watching.)

What a great nostalgia!  So glad you have those memories. 

 

For me, my memories date back to the 1950s when I would travel to Milwaukee with my parents for Milwaukee Braves games - Aaron, Spahn, Matthew, Adcock, etc and we would always go for a series with the Dodgers - Spahn/Drysdale, Burdette/Koufax...I loved it, but even today it was the pitching matchup - the starters taking the mound even with all the HOF batters - that really excited.

 

You are right about the unwritten rules and the potential for injury that taking the fielder out or throwing at the batter created - stupid.  Unfortunately in our highly stat minded game those unwritten rules persist.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...